yes also enough proof for me. he can beat that hawking guy in basketball easily...

Gravity is still a fact. I bet you haven't heard about Eotvos experimemt. It can prove gravity every single time you try it. Just like cavendish experiment. But nice lie again.

Gravity is a theory you piece of shit.

Dude it is a law LOL.  Please note the word in red...

Newtons Law of Universal Gravitation.

So you've conceded the point, agreed it's a "belief", pointed out that people just assume shit and figure its a good idea just to maintain the status-quo and exploit the situation by carving the bullshit into stone. Did I miss anything?



Here, have a slinky:


"anti-gravity" slinky

OK, maybe not but you can have the error message I got instead.

There is the scientific theory of gravity and the law of gravity.
The law is the mathematical relationship that describes what happens from observations, it is an analytic statement of observed fact.
The scientific theory is the researched and tested framework for the how and why of the observation, in this case Einstein's theory of relativity is used to explain the how and why of Newton's law of universal gravitation.
Further, to become a scientific theory, an idea must be thoroughly tested, and must be an accurate and predictive description of the natural world.

Gravity acts toward the center of mass. If your ball was outside of the earth's gravitational pull and sufficiently large that any water you put on it was negligible in mass compared to it then yes you'd have no problem getting the water to stay.

The reason the water doesn't fly off the earth as it spins is because the force due to the spin is miniscule compared to that of gravity. To get yourself flung off the earth it would require the earth to spin about 17 times faster than it does (a day would be about 1.5 hours) and then that would only be valid at the equator.

Thanks bkbirge.  I have more research to do.  But just to throw this out about gravity, I will leave this here.  https://phys.org/news/2014-10-what-is-the-value-of.html
Just more questions.

Relativity is a theory, a shitty one that's wrong; the Sagnac Effect experimentally proves the existence of an aether.

1) It was not performed in the 17th century but rather the late 18th century (1797-98) but hey sure looks better if you lie a hundred or 2 years!
2) It was NOT simply viewed through a hole in the wall.  The entire experiment was in a 10x10x10  2 foot thick wooden structure which was inside another building on Cavendish's estate.  The experiment was viewed through a telescope through a hole in the structure.  But again I get that it sounds a whole lot better as a lie.


3) Again what kind of horseshit is this.  It absolutely has been repeated, MANY times, in fact the torsion bar apparatus Cavendish used is the basis for almost ALL experiments measuring big G.  There have also been some none Cavendish experiments that showed very interesting results.  A few years ago they measured big G to several decimal places using single atoms by which they measured the path deviation when they passed by different objects.

You are nothing but a deluded liar, jesus fucking christ.  You have 3 flat out lies in 2 sentences...  Like ALL your posts they contain blatant lies and nonsensical bullshit to try to fit your deluded image of reality.

Literally almost every post you make is full of lies and bullshit twisted to try to fit your delusions.  I can't fucking believe anyone would listen to your bullshit and outright lies but then this idiot comes in not understanding how water sticks to a ball...