I've never used the following but it might come in handy for those who are too lazy to contact the real police:

http://www.antifraudcentre-centreantifraude.ca/reportincident-signalerincident/index-eng.htm

Interesting idea. I think that might have something to it. Though i think when such a threshold exists then it would only be a threshold for criminal investigations. Victims still could go after him the civil law way. Though the less the damage the higher the chance no one will spend more money on that topic.

I think he started paying back when people started to connect him ot other scams. It might be way way worse for him when he can be connected to those.

I think you can sue for any amount you want, just might be not worth it especially for foreign victims.


It's in the post you quoted and also has been posted earlier in the thread. Yes, same mailing address and name, not much doubt here.

Something i'm wondering about is why he was not able to hide his real identity. It should be possible without much effort to have this eric being an invented identity. Even possible to receive packages with it.

If that is the case then paying back part of the small scammed amounts from this escrow account could be a way to make everyone sure that this is the real him. Leading people in the wrong direction and making them lose their courage.

Well, at the end he really might be not the smartest when reading his stories. It's really funny how i now await him playing even that part for reaching a deeper purpose. Well, you never know what to trust on when it comes to scammers it seems.

Fucking accountants.   Someone dropped his name somewhere in this thread a few pages back but not the rest of the dox. 

Props, Tecshare.

Wouldnt fraud be a reason to be excluded from practise of accounting.   I guess an actual conviction might be required but still seems very reckless way to lose a livelihood not cheap to acquire ?

Its not really about bitcoin, I think the same of exchange failures also as they work opposite to bitcoin being distributed and are naturally flawed systems.  To run escrow and then sell your account is incredibly low and does not exclude responsibility by the original owner in the theft imo


http://forums.steamrep.com/threads/report-76561197994994008-csgo-counter-strike-global-offensive-items.114476/

To be excluded from being able to work in pretty much any field that requires some kind of license or background check, you pretty much need to have a conviction against you (or a guilty plea, or in some cases entering into a divergence plan that results in the charges being dropped). Even an indictment is not going to be sufficient to prevent someone from getting a license, although few companies are going to want to hire someone who is currently under indictment.

For what ?
Did you guys forget you spent years saying no regulations ?
You all don't want ANY laws and chant FREE MARKET like a broken record until..

I have been laughing at the scene before and during GOXX ROFL

@Quickseller
That was more directed at the whole crypto scene than you

Maybe you will all start to rethink the concept of crypto-regulations ? (after enough of these stories pop up)

Man, he's so cool. He is relaxing and playing games after a pulling out a massive scam.