If only you spent this much energy looking for a girlfriend you wouldn't need to masturbate in public.
I just wanted to tell you that you are right holding onto the dox until you decide to release it, and that it's not worth the discussions.
However after reading this comment, please coninue. Hahaha
I also think that it's his choice if he dox him or not, right or wrong, doesn't matter. Also, it's the chois of master-p if he keeps the funds for himself (and I'm almoust shure that he will) or if he returns them to their rightfull owners. Is it wrong? offcourse it is, but the point is that it doesn't matter someone's oppinion about this. It's the same in the case of TECSHARE.
The right thing (and also the only thing) to do, in my oppinion, is to pursue legal action against master-p:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Sentencing/Offences/Fraud_Over_$5,000
Fraud
380. (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act,
defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or
...
1.) 10 thefts of less than 5k != 1 theft of > 5k.
2.) dozens of ponzi promoters (advertising a ponzi website in sigs) will have to press charges.
3.) TL;DR: ain't gonna happen.
Read it again: defrauds the public.
May I ask, newbie account with 10 posts, what is your interest of discouraging legal actions against the scammer?
OK, internet lawyer, prove me wrong.
Do I have time to go grab something to eat, or keep pounding F5?
2. Aggravating factors
Some of the most common aggravating factors considered in fraud sentencing cases
include:
1. A high degree of planning and deliberation, a lengthy time over which the fraud took place, and a substantial number of transactions required to commit the fraud;
2. Greed;
3. Personal profit;
4. The size of the fraud;
5. The nature of the victim (e.g. elderly individual, institution, public agency,
and the number of victims;
As you can see in a fraud, the number of victims is an aggravating factor!
Now, may I ask you again, newbie account with 11 posts, what is your interest of discouraging legal actions against the scammer?
If you continue the discussion without answering the question, you will be on my ignore list because you have nothing to say.
Also, keep in mind this:
What if I pay back the money?
Once a charge of Fraud has been laid, you are in the system and your criminal matter will proceed. Paying back whatever money is alleged to have been defrauded will not result in any automatic dropping of the charges. The matter is in the hands of the Crown prosecutor. An offer to pay back the money or value of the property in certain situations may be useful as a mitigating factor and result in a lower penalty. In certain situations where the case against you is not very strong, your lawyer may be able to use an offer to pay back money or return property as a bargaining tool that may result in charges against you being dropped.
