First of all congratulations . I agree with you that with math everything is possible. I am curious about puzzle 130 because I was trying to solve it with math , just answer yes/no/too far/close enough. The private key start with 0x3A8 and it was even number at the end ?

Well it is an interesting finding but just remember that you don't need the Private key to generate the address, just the public key. we can send some dust to puzzle 160 in the ETH network or any other alt-chain.

For example public key #160


ETH address: 0x23668cEA3E64d65745617dAff67F115eCb28f0Aa

https://etherscan.io/address/0x23668CEA3E64D65745617DAFF67F115ECB28F0AA

Do a I have the 160 private key?
NO!!

@ronin445 i don't know if you are just trolling or it was a serious assumption?

Hi! I am ready to give you a method that will help you greatly reduce the time spent searching for puzzles 135, 140, 145, 150, 155, 160, and put an end to all this. Since I don't have programming skills, I can't automate it. You can write to me in person.

We are all very excited that you finally decided to be ready to share with us these exciting breakthroughs.

It was already more than 24 hours since the last range splitter range reducer point divider post was brought upon our limited attention. We need to never let those ideas die off! No matter how often it is explained why it does not work and why it can not work, and why it will never work, and how it actually makes things much slower, instead of much faster, it is a true inspiration to see the same question and the same idiotic idea repeated over and over and over again by new and old users.

Let's not break the cycle! Who cares that solving any problem is more or less just a matter of having enough money to spend, to actually be able to afford computing the solution? Give me a few million $ and I can solve all of those puzzles for you in less than a few months, if not faster - how about that as an actual end to all of this?

OK, so basically the same old shit: "I don't have anything palpable, just some idea that everyone says it doesn't apply, but what do they know? I'll just throw some lateral blah blah instead of some actual statements with proofs, because hyped up emotions are better than logical thinking". Too tired of that non-sense.

Does math cost money? Does logic, theorems, proofs, cost money? All of those were always made free to everyone, for nothing in exchange except dying poor and oh, remaining in history books for all eternity. just look at the last 5000 years of human progress.

You know what costs money? Absolutely everything that you can't do by your own hands. That's almost literally why money exists in this world. Also, I changed my mind. Since you can't code, but I can, I would charge you around 500 million $ if you want your idea put in practice. Also, I can not guarantee your idea would actually work, since it's your idea, not mine. I am just charging for the wasted time on my side, you will also pay for all the equipment and resources and electricity needed to implement whatever you have in mind.

Not the other way around, because I don't care about your idea, but you seem to care about your idea being coded and "automated", if I am not mistaken.

What?? What kind of idea is that? Seems that you don't have idea how it works, yes you mention it as an example but it sounds like lets take an apple and a pineapple, combine them to get an pear.

@bibilgin I understand to @kTimesG he looks tired of the same shit over and over and I am also tired of that, Every time them and now some random dude ask for my help to develop their ideas, but those ideas usually has little or not background at all they are just based on biased knowledge or incomplete data usually like (I believe this, i think that this works like this.)

That is called the Dunning-Kruger effect


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT81fe2IobI

Alberto has nothing to hide. His work and contributions are fully open-source, and anyone can freely inspect the code, methods, and results. This transparency is a fundamental part of his approach, allowing anyone interested to understand, critique, and even improve upon his work.

His dedication to transparency, even in the face of frequent criticism, speaks volumes about his integrity. It’s not about hiding something but about pushing forward with reasonable ideas that anyone can engage with, test, and verify.

Not all ideas can be considered, especially if they lack a solid mathematical or technical basis. In complex fields like this one, rigorous testing and validation are key.

BSGS relies on extensive precomputation and memory, while Kangaroo relies on random hops without storing sets of points, they can't be combined directly. Mixing them would mean losing the efficiency of both methods, as each relies on distinct principles that don't translate into a hybrid approach.

My Q were above, unfortunately no one take notice
Fyi
You need to add 1 into 17 to make 3 share as per asked above, where no floating points appear in result

Same your searched pubkey in kangaroo method is not enough for finding fast, because it's working in sqrt and cuderoot
So you need adjust with add or subtract with some steps for make it proper and quicker finding in big ranges, definitely for adjust pubkey , math will help you