The day when an address-only puzzle gets solved based on statistics is the day when secp256k1 security level goes to zero, SHA-256 is revealed to be broken, and RIPEMD proves to have patterns in it. All of these need to be broken both in tandem and in relationship to one with each other. Oh, and let's not forget about the base58 prefixes indicating somehow the private key position. Or was it the RIPEMD range? Wait, I guess that's normal for a base transform. If you give me binary number I'm pretty sure I can tell you where the value lies in either decimal, octal, hex, and base64, or any other base.

Looking forward to that day where the avalanche effect is proven to not exist, and the curve equation maps perfectly to some hash of a hash of running tens of scrambling rounds on public key bits, and then some!  Randomness would then get redefined to "it was all a hoax by big pharma". Most infrastructure of government security would cause a massive world war the same day, since they are all compromised, because, you know, hashes are broken and elliptic curves understanding is reduced to a cat's toy. Until that time, can you stop the useless spam and keep your fantastic discoveries to yourself? What's the point of sharing them, do you want someone else to steal your ideas and find the key before you?

It will take about 1 year!

For answers to all your questions,

https://brainwalletx.github.io/

it would be useful to check it out.

---

I think,
I said with some information.

What kind of information?!

You mean you can reduce keyspace of a random search process?
5 years experience is not bad try harder if you think you can skip some ranges in random search ) The only thing that can help him is giving him finished ranges

Instead of just bragging, solve puzzle #67 by your way ) This is not a place for talk. This is a place for action.

Hahahaha, look at him:



It's better for everyone to just ignore him and his useless ideas, I'm talking to anyone reading this. I promise he can't even write a simple program ) maybe he is just a child or a brainless person )

You are so funny  Reading your history is my new hobby now ))


If I were you, after all these wrong predictions, I would just keep quiet.

Lol... Congratulations on wasting your 5 years. The hash function was specifically designed so that there wouldn’t be any pattern or relationship between the private key and the address.

First, go and research how a hash is created in the first place; you will automatically understand everything you talked about is BS. Your research is just nonsense and a complete waste of time. You wasted 5 years trying to find a pattern, but if you had invested those 5 years studying how a hash works, it would have been much better. I’m saying this from my own experience.