1. Yes
2. No
3. -
4. I am a stakeholder in just a few projects: BTC, ETH and LISK. I have no reason to partake in any other discussions that I am not invested in, especially not on this weird-ass forum that's ridden with third-world country scammers. I don't discuss ETH or BTC, I consider them proven projects. Their challenges and potentials are known to everyone. That leaves LISK. As a proposed ''Ethereum killer/counterpart" but without anything substantial to back that claim, I saw the chance for a quick and hefty post-ICO profit, but absolutely nothing long-term. So far I'm right on track, the rest of you aren't. The proof is in the pudding.

There are simply too many people here who fail to realise that we're in a dotcom bubble 2.0. 99% of the crypto projects will fail spectacularly. One day, the realisation will hit that no one really gives a shit about decentralisation yet. There will be but a handful of winners, with actual utility or as proven stores of value. I'm sorry, but Lisk is not one of them. It is too ambiguous, the team seems amateurish at best. If all you have to go by is wishful thinking or empty arguments  akin to 'javascript reaches millions of developers' then please re-consider if you should treat LISK as a short or long term project for your own finances.

Stakeholder, lol.
You look so stupid with your posts, even you try to look smart.
Nobody who really hold lisk, will post such bs.

You missed the train and you are scared. Because lisk can beat any project.

I've read every single post of Vidale and as a Lisk holder; he has a point.

There is no 1 person here who is arguing on his level by using good arguments and points. What he actually sees is a one big wall of fud and misunderstanding.
And what I miss here, are people who can explain why Lisk will be the next good project without screaming ; you've missed the ICO.

So let's try again folks and discuss with each other with arguments.

This article: https://steemit.com/lisk/@dan/why-lisk-is-inferior-to-ethereum

...was very attacking against Lisk but was changed fundamentally in the last 24 hours. The topic has changed to "Steem as a Smart Contract Platform" (before it was: "Why Lisk is inferior to Ethereum"), there is no single word left about Ethereum and the attacks against Lisk were mitigated. What is left is PR for Steem but nothing special.

Anybody any idea why it was changed that extreme?

Vidale,

You are 100% wrong about Lisk.

Lisk's disruptive design of allowing mainstream developers to easily deploy their JavaScript Apps using Lisk SDK on Sidechains, is far more scalable and will see far more adoption than Ethereum.

On Ethereum; App developers are forced to learn Solidity and they must build multiple smart contracts, then connect them together just build a Dapp. This is a huge burden for Dapp development among mainstream developpers, that's why Ethereum failed to produce more than a dozen working Dapps and it continues to remain in the test labs of well funded or bank backed experiments like R3CEV.

DO WE NEED LISK?

YES! Absolutely;
Lisk is clearly the best chance to introduce mainstream App developers to Blockchain technology, the entire crypto-sphere should be rooting for Lisk.

Ethereum's steep learning curve and painstaking process of building smart contracts & dapps, still fails to attract mainstream App developers to build Dapps.

Within next few months, Lisk App store will boast far more Dapps than Ethereum, then people will realize the disruptive magnitude of Lisk.

Yeah, this trap is quite obvious.

Let's see how many fools will come back here with FUD, trying to justify their messes.

Why arent the devs make a roadmap?

Where are Javascript App develepors?
It takes a while this way to meet the level of ETH.