Over 30 percent of all Lisk is in Poloniex's wallet. Does concern me a bit.
I mean, I don't think they would vote, but with people probably having their lisk laying in wallets they don't intend to touch for a long time and lazy people, holding 30% could be close to 51, when it comes down to voting power.
If Polo gets hacked and someone gets their hands on that wallet, the Lisk network as a whole would be in great danger
In the early stages I think LSKHQ should make a list of who they believe are trustworthy, valuable delegates, that besides their other activities also share some of their profits, as well as simple instructions how to vote for them. (I'm not sure this can be done via the web wallet?)
1/2 of the 15% inflation going to profit sharing would be 7.5% p.a, given less than 1/2 of LSK will probably vote that means >15% interest per year for those that remove LSK from exchanges and vote, in the process decentralizing LSK and supporting delegates that are also adding value to LSK in other ways.
As the delegate system matures, LSKHQ can stop making a recommendation list for those that want to vote but don't have time to vet 101 delegates.
(A recommendation list from a centralized source like LiskHQ may sound counter-intuitive but given we're reliant on LISKHQ for the first 1-2 years of development, we're pretty reliant on them anyway. So I think anything that simplifies the process and gets people to remove their LSK from exchanges and start to participate in voting is positive at this stage.)
