What about "Cooperative, efficient blockchain generation"? Is there some more explanation?
Lisk holders will vote 101 people into the position of Active Delegates who will run Lisk nodes that add blocks to the Lisk blockchain every 10 seconds. This system is called Distributed Proof of Stake (DPoS). Any particular individual will add one block every 17 minutes and will receive 5 Lisk every 17 minutes during year one for performing this task. This system goes in a round-robin clockwork fashion with everybody knowing their turn will come only once per 17 minute cycle and will not be contested by the others. Such cooperation means only one hash needs to be generated per block time.
Contrast this with the competitive system used by Bitcoin and Ethereum, which has tens of thousands of miners simultaneously generating literally trillions of hashes that are ALL mathematically valid to add the next block to their blockchain. These valid hashes are discarded until one randomly comes up with an agreed-upon number of leading zeros in it, which act as a "winning lottery ticket" to pick which miner makes the block and gets the reward.
Both Ethereum and Bitcoin engage in PROPAGANDA that all these trillions of hashes are "necessary to secure the blockchain". That's bullshit. Any single hash generated by any single miner could do that. Instead, their trillions of hashes are a way to pick a winner in a get-rich-quick scheme and nothing more.
This difference is the main reason Lisk will be around long after Bitcoin and Ethereum have drowned in their own ever-growing hash pool.