See, it's posts like the above that make me think you are literally mentally retarded. You just start spewing bullshit that has disconnected from anything that was previously posted, it's incredible. You can't help yourself from either lying or being so misinformed that you are just an idiot.
Lets look at what you've written:
I believe it is just a coincidence that you have stated a dozen or so times that BFL would remain competitive with any competitors offerings.
Then coincidentally raised your specs [50%] from 40 to 60 to meet Avalons 60Gh/s. (at that time)
Purely by Coincidence of course?
Yes, we've stated that, and as I've already pointed out, we raised it because of bASIC, not Avalon. We did not give a crap about 66 GH/s at $2000. We did, however, give a crap about 54 GH/s at $1069. If you can't see the difference and why this is, I can't help you. Please go back to elementary math.
bASIC remained at 54Gh/s until just recently. In December they took on the initiative to produce a redesign for 72Gh/s before they imploded due to customer concerns and refunds.
Perhaps what you are actually leading me to believe is that BFL does not intentionally compete with certain ASIC companies? A strange admittance coming from you.
Then I suppose you no longer have a competitor and don't need to worry about Avalon raising it's specs up to 66Gh/s. BFL customer will be glad to know they will not have to worry about you "over-competing" with the now defunct ASIC player.
I wonder if this is good news. Or if you are losing your marbles?
Do you actually read what you write? This is incoherent babbling for the most part, but that's not surprising coming from you. Especially now that you're in panic mode that your Avalons actually are pieces of shit and they apparently haven't shipped on time, either. (remains to be seen on the shipping)...
bASIC did not take the initiative in December with 72 GH/s... we knew it was all bullshit then, which is why I stated we would match a shipping product. There is simply no way for Tom to have shipped a 72 GH/s product at 120w at 90nm structured ASIC... sorry. Anyone with any common sense knew this was impossible, except you, but you never had common sense, so it's not surprising. But you're right, Avalon is not a competitor at 400w for 66 GH/s at $1299 or especially $1499. Does that mean we won't raise the speed on our units? I don't know, we haven't decided yet... but if it do it's not because of Avalon heh.
Arrogance is all that I am reading.
Your priorities are interestingly "screwed". Your more worried about Avalons 400w than their GH/s.
Well whatever, if it get your caught with your pants down once the reviews take place, it is none of my concern.
------------
At least give your customer an extra 20Gh/s for their last 45 days of wait time. You did it once on principle, you should do it again.
Strangely enough it seems every time you bump the specs...new troubles arise.
Heh... yes, it happened once, so that make a trend. God you are such an idiot.
Strange, it almost sounds like you are stating you have only had one respin.
Perhaps you should recount how many wafer batches you have thrown out between each correction to this date as you correct for "issues". Try using your fingers to count the masks, I am sure that will make it easier.
