If the object of the game is to agree on which transactions/blocks are valid, then why would you introduce a competition? Competition and agreement are opposing concepts; it's not possible to agree with a proposition whilst also simultaneously contesting it. Bitcoin runs on consensus, and competing nodes is anti-consensus, by definition.
I concur. Even though there are times that a "challenge" to the existing team might be necessary, wanting to introduce competition as a 'standard' is foolish.
I've decided to go along with whatever Randyfolds, Kluge, dree12 and LoupGaroux agree is right. But they all need to respond in this thread.
Why those individuals?
I will stay and I really do not think it matters which side wins. This will work itself out organically as it is a great design and well thought out.
And everyone will live happily ever after?

I will stay as there is and will always be a lot profit to be made with Bitcoin.
So you're only here because of profit? How lovely.