Numbers at the moment are 0.00001955 (Which is ARG, not CAP, which is 0.00002920... Unless you are off by 0.00001 for some reason, on purpose...)
CAP also, based on looking at the open orders and how I would sum them to get to the necessary depth, looks accurately calculated.
(You never calculate on open-orders... that is potential only. Bots don't list what they actually have to sell, or even real prices. They use probes to "feel the market". You have to look at actual "sold values". The API gives you averages and highs and lows and opens and closes... Though I am not sure why any of those values are not used.)
Well, the value of 0.00001500, which it just was, wasn't even a low, or a volume average, or even a sale...
Even using the last 10K sell volume price and 10K buy volume price, averaged out to 20k price, would not come close to the numbers that the website is reporting, (on coin-choose). Coin-warz has the averages correct.
Seems like it is taking the averages of the lows, which is hardly fair or accurate, for determining value for miners. Though, for miners, they are more interested in the BUY price more than the SELL, if they cash-out instantly. But not the lowest BUY, which bots manipulate to get coins cheap, to sell higher. Eg, there was one spike at 0.00001000 with only 18,000 coins (all that guys listings). Surrounded by over 100,000 sales over 0.00002500... That hardly averages to 0.00001500. That was one sale of 0.00001000 (his), and all his listings which were all above that value. (I have been watching it all day, the last few days.
)
In any event. It doesn't seem like many people are using that site for the actual values anyways. So I am working on one that does a little more in-depth value. (Those who do use that site, now I know why they never get what they think they should be getting.
) For them, it may be fine, but for actual relationship value, it isn't helping anyone other than the coins it estimates wrong, in favor of.
