couple of points:
1. There is no such thing as a nibblecoin.
2. I honestly do not think you know what actually makes a successful currency .
3. does "bringing something new to the table" = a successful currency?
But however , i can certainly tell you what will make a currency NOT successful .
4. a popular image inside its market environment, where individuals involved feel that it is inequitable - some example of that are the common pre-mine procedures, in all their variation , so:
{and I want to talk slowly here ok, very slowly]} , if it becomes commonly available to the people involved that there is a virtual software ASIC released only to the DEV and insiders, {slowing this down here} theeeen as per what i just stated, that will not drive confidence in the currency, sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
you can get away with that sort of thing maybe once , maybe twice, then. people. will. not. support that scam.
I've got pictures ready, stick figures.
5. before anyone says it Bitcoin is the one time , and it wasn't intentional, i don't believe the "Grand conspiracy" people in the market just done what was best for them, the great thing about it is , that because of certain reasons , a new ignorant vector has been introduced , this ignorant vector is the wider market that invested, these people are represented buy the wider investment community , so as they are unaware of the information in the market environment they have no problem with this aspect of the currency, so there is some grace time , in this regard.
6. but for a start up , this particular information effect does not apply , even though the GLD scammers are trying to make it apply .
I can tell English is not your first langauge (not a diss), but it is hard to understand you. I'm not going to get in a pissing match with you.
You clearly have strong opinions on what forces are the biggest drivers of the cryptocurrency market. If you are as savvy as you sound confident, then you should be making bank. However, I think your view is very skewed from reality. The biggest issue with premine is the PERCEPTION that someone behind the scenes is taking advantage of people. Why would someone invest in a coin if they have that personal perception that they are a pawn in someone else's game? Another way to put it, if someone could get away with premining and no one knows about it, that currency could still theoretically thrive depending on what that person does with the premined coins.
However, I will bring the focus back to where it belongs... There is no evidence of a YaCoin premine. If you want to claim some sort of pseudo-premine in that GPUs have a huge advantage in the beginning which will be obsolete in the future, then call it how it is. If someone had a GPU miner early on but didn't tell anyone for a long time, then welcome to the world of crypto. I guess I shouldn't be surprised as it seems every single currency that is released is deemed a scam by some people. Litecoin has been called a scam on more than one occasion. Is OneCoin a scam? I would say it has had a much more 'fair' release than YaCoin. Do you think that will matter in the long term?
