No, that's exactly what I'm saying.  Campaign managers should absolutely expect posts to be comprehensible.  Some English is broken, but some people shouldn't even attempt it.  And the Google translate thing just doesn't work.  I think you and a lot of the other managers do a good job of weeding out the shitposters.  I've seen you guys reject a lot of applicants, and I'm happy to see that.  And as I said, I don't have a problem with the English skills of the campaign managers.  They aren't the ones who are flooding this forum with shit.

It's not how often you post, it's what/where you post.

---

We are well aware of how effective SMAS is/will be. This also makes it easy to identify both managers and services that indirectly endorse spam.

Depends on the particular user, as this is more on a case-by-case basis. However, the answer is likely yes, since these users usually show no sing of any quality in their (remaining) posts.

Anyone truly involved in Bitcoin can't bother doing this for 0.05 mBTC; at least you could delete your own old posts (which is not something any spammer would do).

Rules are campaign specific, and the best ones would completely ignore that section. For example, Bitmixer would not count those posts, thus you would not get paid for them. However, this does not mean that I still wouldn't ban you from it.

Here's the latest weekly update:

My lists have been updated and differently formatted now, which can be shown in the Bitmixer thread.

I suggest that you stop trolling/trying to be funny. This thread is not self moderated and can easily get derailed. You have issues that you need to take care of in your own campaign anyway.

Nice find. Everything leads me to believe that they are definitely connected. I've been checking my list, and it seems that all of those were enrolled in Bitmixer at some point. I have tagged every account for severe abuse of signature campaigns. I've already updated all of my lists and added those to the permanent blacklist.

How about this guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=851646
I see there's so many complaints about this user for the issue of spamming and also in trolling, including yahoo from the last campaign he managed, the iconomi.

I haven't seen any daily campaign with minimum post limit except Bitsupra signature campaign but that too had minimum post limit of 1 post.

Second thing is, meeting maximum posts is not compulsory. Its upto the participant. Also if a user is making a high quality post then campaign manager has no valid reason to ban. But also a user must keep his post pace in control at the same time as well.

No one asked you to post fast. Its upto you whether to keep pace with minimum or post fast or leave it.