In my defense I think I was doing well delivering good content and have made decent discussions in all the sports betting related threads I posted in.

Edit:  And yes I would love to help out cleaning that sub.  I will report more threads here or through your PM, whichever you want.

Attention hilariousandco.  Here are the suggested threads that are potentially dumb and made for spamming.  Lock at your own discretion.  

If you were rich, would you still gamble?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1408235.0

I mean really?  What kind of a question is that?  And what is it really trying to achieve.

Is their any safe methods to gamble?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1232896.0

Just laughable.  The thread starter probably took a while to come up with that one.

Is Bitcoin the future of online gambling?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1177050.0

It's a fine topic.  But not something that should reach 41 pages of spam.

do you can control your self when playing gambling?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1595920.0

This could be a good psychology topic for gambling.  But the thread starter is suspect.  Looks like a farmed account that started a thread for other farmed accounts to join in.

How to stay away from gambling? suggestions ?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1249010.0

Another topic that shouldn't reach 50 pages of mostly spam.

Can I use my small amount for GAMBLING?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1576153.0

The thread starter's thought process:  'Another day, another thread.'

What would the Casino of your dreams look like?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1711940.0

Arguably could be placed in the Off Topic sub.  But the premise is overall not really good.  But good for all sorts of spam.

Dice Games Are So Much Fun
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1546143.0

Yay for you, OP!  Yup, they are so much fun.  There's no need to start a thread about it and invite all sorts of spam though.

If you want to become Rich you need to Put Higher bets
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1517188.0

No sh*t, Sherlock.  Oh wait...  the thread reached 43 pages!

Putting money in lottery is gambling too?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1568660.0

Le sigh.

This is just the first page of the Gambling Discussion sub.  Will follow up with more this week.

To my campaign manager, Boxx, you don't have to pay me for this post if you think it doesn't serve the needs of BitDice.

I just found this thread, I would love to see the guys with fortunejack signatures banned to hell. I actually post in the gambling section mostly, It's the most frustrating thing to get responses that don't mean anything and the author has no idea what he is actually posting about.
Fortunejack doesn't reply anymore to the thread, they just rely on their shills to post some garbage.

Sorry if that is a rant, Bitcoin and gambling are my two favorite things, I would post ten times more here if there was intellectual unbiased conversation.

Thank you for this development

There's already been a big group being weeded out right before they had to restart their campaign.
I don't think much changed though, so there is quite possibly another group (or further alts from the same person) still taking advantage of that campaign.

They've been the first campaign/advertiser to be warned by Staff (hilarious in this case) about what they are doing.

Being in charge of the 777Coin campaign, I'd like to comment here, this is my personal opinion, and not representing SMAS/the other members.
I didn't set up the campaign and the rules were made like that when I took over. I however accepted the rules like that and am running the campaign in this way right now.
I think a bonus payment system is way better than systems like FortuneJack or others, which require a certain amount of posts in the gambling subsection.
It's indeed giving an additional incentive to post in gambling sections (which obviously is the goal of it), but unlike the others, it still gives the users the option not to.
You're free to disagree on this.

Thanks for the support.

---

Been some time since the last update, laudas new list came out yesterday and yahoo should have an updated version available aswell,
I'll update the thread tomorrow morning and create the combined list.

Your actions don't have to be labeled 'spam' for you to get blacklisted from a campaign.

I've just checked, and it seems that Lutpin took the full list instead of the list with people that got banned for spamming. The people that were personally banned by Yahoo shouldn't be in the SMAS list, similarly the people that I've banned for breaking the rules in Bitmixer shouldn't (and aren't) either.

My account got added on that list for no reason, since my posts are good enough. Now it's pretty much useless since most sig campaings are using the stupid centralized lists instead of taking the time to look for good members for themselves.

Honestly this forum is becoming a chore to use. You can't no longer have fun. You are always paranoid about how your account will be trashed because you posted a reply that was too short, or you posted a couple of messages in a row... ridiculous. We should be able to shitpost a bit and have fun even when wearing a signature campaing, just let the admins fo the signature campaings decide if they will pay us or not for the posts individually. Sometimes I was in a campaing and I felt like replying a really short answer or posting a funny gif as a reply or shit like that, but I was too paranoid that I would end up getting banned. Somehow I still ended up on that list.

Let's just hope there are still sig managers willing to select members for themselves instead of blindly trusting a list made by other people.

Another ridiculous thing. People take breaks, sometimes they don't post for months, who cares about how long the person's break is as long as they do a good job when they are actually posting within the campaign term.
You are going to raise standards so high that you'll end up banning like 99% of people from campaigns.

You're blacklisted by 2 managers, yet you claim that no manager ever complained about you?

Tl;dr: I should be allowed to spew out garbage while I'm participating in a signature campaign. How about no?

I was not aware of this, source?

---

Correct. That is also likely going to get you banned depending on your posting quality. This is why we give people a chance for review, 1 month after your ban. (@oblivi).

~18% of the total users (normal list + special list + banned list) are currently enrolled in Bitmixer. I've actually had a small *spike* of very constructive users lately, thus your argument is invalid.