Something is troubling me about the 62.5 MB to 1 BTC rate ... In the opening post, it is written:


Let's assume for the sake of argument that 16*10⁶ bitcoins are linked for the second round, so this means that 10¹⁵ bytes should be distributed which wouldn't be possible, or am I missing something? Thx.

The waves ICO made 29636 Bitcoins. If all sasha had left to link was 4800 BTC then he will probably have very little left to link for the next byteball round. He's burning through those 29636 Bitcoins very fast.

PM sent.

There was 100 000 GB distributed in the first round.
This means that there will be 10 000 GB distributed to byteball holders in the second round (0.1 new bytes for every 1 byte received in the 1st round).

Let us assume that in the second round there will be 100 000 BTC linked.
This would mean there will be 6250 GB distributed according to BTC balances.

So most likely the dev will distribute much less bytes in the second round (than in the first round).

People tend to be suspicious about cryptos where the majority of coins is held by the dev for a long time.

This is not like Bitcoin where you know everything about the distribution from the beginning. Here we have the dev who reserves the right for himself to distribute most coins arbitrarily in the future. A free airdrop distribution is risky but possible. But here there is one person who controls 90 percent of the total amount of coins and this one person can ARBITRARILY decide about their future distribution. For months, maybe year(s) to come.

This must make byteball feel like a joke for any serious investor.

Right. The worst dirstibution model ever.
4-5 ico owner basically hold 50% coins. And will grab more,more and more every round. For do what? Absolutly nothing.

For example raiblocks used a captcha-faucet with a very small available every day. that required user to work to get coins,user needed to spent times on faucet. and the poorest guys from india to donald trump if they wanted raiblocks, they have the same chance to get based on their times and effort.

Decred used to apply to a webform and prove acvities, and averyone got same share amount.

Here what we have?
I could have promote byteball for months, daily spent to tweet,talk,suggestion and at the end? comes lisk and waves dev that gained 20% supply to just press 1 button.

This sounds fair to you?


We warned several times tony about that. He just ignored community. And community was right.
So, hope he will stop this distribution based on btc link. And use more wide adoption for everyone.


Like UR(another example). free coin for everyone in the world. Everyone will receive same amount. That's is a wide adoption.

Even a lottery would be better.

In this unlikely case, we'll distribute the remaining 88% proportionally.

do not worry

BYTEBALL will be great.