Back to the topic.
You're right, it does not matter to me. Or is it? It is a point of interest to me - fact.
Either you are transparent or not. Where is the problem?
It's not a problem that you are asking. Although transparency is a buzzword that I care little about. Did we promise that? I can't remember, doubt it. Regardless we are not trying to hide anything of course, so questions are welcome as long as they are reasonable.
You didn't really ask about the Lisk voting, more like commented on it, my "none of your business" was an answer to releated to that.
bitseedmike told me you have a budget of USD 40,000 per month. Now I take a look into your BTC wallet - and before today, I have not read anything about a second funding round (Website, OP, Roadmap, Whitepaper...) - so I wonder and ask how? This is a totally normal question.
After it became apparent that we won't get an optimal amount of funding we adapted plans accordingly. Not sure about the budget, it will certainly be adjusted, but I don't think it will be 40k per month. Mike or someone else may tell you more about it, bust most likely at a later date.
About second funding round. Our plans for if the TEC doesn't reach minimum threashold wasn't detailed initially in the whiteapaper, but info about the optional refund and later use of those leftover funds were all over this thread and blog, slack, etc for weeks.
In short. The coin distribution were determined as it was the 2000 BTC threashold were reached, but as it wasn't this left over a respectable amount of ARK tokens along with the amounts that those who ask for refunds would have reveived. This ARK will be in a special fund and will be used to raise additional capital at a later date.
