i am glad that in did not invest in this ICO. read this:
http://themerkle.com/top-three-failed-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-icos/Ark, a service aimed to bridge blockchains and develop new distributed services, has
an inexperienced team with
no clear market, and a very
doubtful technological backbone powering this solution. Despite attracting investors early,
mainly due to very suspiciously large bonuses, interest in the project died off rather quickly. A token exchange campaign is still going on, but it remains to be seen how viable this program will be in the long run.
So if someone write his opinion you just listen it like a sheep ?
no. i can't listen to written text. are you able to hear what is written in books?
and no. i just posted the link. and if this would be a selfmod topic then this would be deleted.
these articles are so short and lacking real info, I get the feeling they are all paid for.
Wings is going through the same funding issues as us but for whatever subjective reason never get added to the same failed ico's lists that just happen to be popping up recently.
who should paid them to write this about ark?
