We are going forward let's not bend backward and go again on that idea. We came from that thing and learn from that thing. That doesn't mean we have to use banks again.
Sure it will open a new job opportunities and would help alot. But let us think of the long term effect of this.
Bitcoin is decentralized and maybe banks are not the solution on making bitcoin usage a safer way. It is not greediness becaus we are trying to control our OWN money. Ig is taking the responsibility and the full benefit of the coin that we have been working on for a long time of hardships.

I agree with you. all things must have a likes or not, depending on each assessment.
for me, "Bitcoints Bank" is a good idea, especially now. because with the "Bitcoints Bank" can facilitate the exchange performance of bitcoints or other cryptocurrency.

The idea of a bank for bitcoins is really for those who do not understand the concept of a blockchain. A bank for bitcoin just cannot exist, unless we are talking about an organisation that has a large wallet and runs a fractional reserve system for lending and borrowing of bitcoins. And that is what some exchanges are already doing.

Could be hit or miss,bank would create centralization

In a way yes, and in a way no. The bankers are going to be way very richer than even the customers because they’re going to be charging exorbitant fees for their transactions, and if the market crashes the bank might not want to release all your funds

The only interest at a bitcoin bank would be able to trade anytime any ammount without be worried to get funds frozen from the bank, besides that sure some are interested into what the banks can provide to let your coins there, im talking about the fee they would give, like fiat savings. But i dont like it at all, im my own bank i dont need anymore bank to control my money at all, and i can lend my bitcoins at some exchanges as well here, soo i dont see any sense to make such besides be allowed  to trade without issues.

From what I know they are not "banks" but they are "wallets" in which we can store our Bitcoin. Yes they do both have the function of storing your money but the difference is a bank is a business in which it loans out your money and pays you interest in return which Bitcoin wallets don't do it as they only store Bitcoin and they can also exchange with their in-app functions but they don't give any interest whatsoever.

I never can adopt the word "bank" here. The idea and concept of bitcoin should not let this happen anyways. We're not here to buy bitcoins if they will be integrate into a centralized systems such as banks and financial institutions. Bitcoin should stay decentralized.

And the award for the best shitposter goes to...(I hope you are honoured)
Just so you know,the term bank itself is cancer when you speak about it so openly when you're a bitcoin lover.Bitcoin is against anything that controls your money for you.
But anyway,you're a shitposter,there is no point further clarifying the details.

I think that's just defeats the purpose of being decentralized by Bitcoin, it made another thing like a middle man. It serves it like that and I don't agree with it because someone would hold my funds again. If I'm correct, Ripple is somewhat like that but I'm not really sure. It's awesome to think about it but what's change is that the mode of transacting.