I am talking about how "actmyname" is trying to claim that yahoo's negative trust is fair due to FJ claiming that yahoo stole funds. Indeed, this is serious as yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made. Something deeper must be going on here as no one can be that stupid, as you say.
Stop! Wait a minute. Check the date on some of the quotes I showed during my libel post.
Of my opinion, yahoo is the worst campaign manger, who always late with payment
This quote is literally false.
maybe he is always getting druñk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member?
Taken from FJ's thread, this is pretty much libel.
Both these comments happened before the negative trust. Here's some more examples.
I do some research and saw yahoo he is always getting druñk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member?
Unfounded. 'always' implies every time. This is one time.
He love alcohol too much (he is alcoholic) and do not care about company he manages.
Again unfounded.
Then this one from his original thread:https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/2184366.msg21913155#msg21913155
I do some research and saw yahoo opening lots of scam thread against some company in some alternate account. He used the fake profiles, he have over 40 i thinking, and he used those fake profile to trick everyone of the forum.
It is very sad. He try to ruin the reputation of some company here if they did not acept him to be the campaign manager!
If you don't consider any of it libel then you should reevaluate your sense of the law.
