It is not.

Considering the stupidity of the majority of illiterate people around here, there are only two ways to remain sane after dealing with them for a while:
1) Booze.
2) Therapy.

---

Getting 'trashed' every once in a while is fine, albeit I'd avoid doing that around the payment dates. However, arrangements can be hard to delay sometimes. I don't see a single grain of evidence that Yahoo stole any money, and the occasionally delay is acceptable anyways.

Indeed. Tagged.

I should have been clearer.

I am talking about how "actmyname" is trying to claim that yahoo's negative trust is fair due to FJ claiming that yahoo stole funds. Indeed, this is serious as yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made. Something deeper must be going on here as no one can be that stupid, as you say.

The only reason is retaliation for the 100% deserved negative feedback he got. Lauda, even you must admit delaying payments by 26 hours due to being drunk and hungover is asking to get negative feedback. Things like this are the reason feedback exists in the first place. Although FJ might be wrong about the stolen funds (and deserve to get tagged by you), they certainly do not deserve negative feedback simply for reporting misbehavior. Again, that is the whole point of a feedback system to begin with.

Are you sure? I can't see the timestamp of the rating, and it was modified and re-applied thus I can't say which happened.

No? That would be incompetence and bad priorities. Now, if I were to start going after signature campaign managers for their incompetence then we'd see >90% of them taken down by my ratings. Are you sure we want to be going there?

He deserves feedback for libel. You can't go around smearing someone's name as you please, especially not without any actual evidence.

You obviously did not read my entire post. I said your tag is 100% warranted, as it is not known if yahoo has stolen campaign funds.

However, it is not acceptable for a DT member to give negative feedback solely in retaliation, which is what yahoo did. See here. Long before any accusation.

Now you are proven wrong. It would be nice to see a mod like you stand up for what is right around here for once and gain some credibility. As far as I know you ran Bitmixer's campaign very well... why do you defend such irresponsible behavior and false feedback from yahoo?

You are wrong.

Why no warnings to yahoo? All you have said thus far is a short one-line comment halfheartedly condemning the behavior. It is clear in the screenshot provided in my previous post the feedback is solely an act of retaliation based on absolutely nothing but the fact he got caught (by his own-self) delaying 100 members from receiving their payment. Is this something you would do?

Edit: It seems yahoo has edited his original feedback after realizing he got caught. What the heck is going on here?

That is fine, but we never got a clear answer about yahoo. Just a one-line halfhearted comment. Are you going to condemn his delaying of payments by 26 hours and giving false negative feedback?

Dang, yahoo messed up bad. I tried to warn him.

I wonder what happens when NOTARY finds out? Surely they will. Most likely he will get fired like Nexchange did to me. 

What's with the huge amount of people getting mad because someone actually went out and enjoyed life, other than sitting home every day.

I don't understand you people. You guys are pissed off because someone delayed your HUGE payment of 50 dollars by not even 2 hours. Mate that's 50... An average job pays that in 2-3 hours, and you guys are sweating your asses off because yahoo paid out late? At least he showed the courtesy telling you guys payment would be delayed and also explaining it.

Oh no Darkstar didn't pay out chip mixer campaigns, I better sue him and find where he lives.

But seriously, this is yahoo's SMAS blacklisted thread, stop spamming it, make a new one or just go away.

I think NOTARY wouldn't mind, why would a trusted campaign manager, who has had basically no issues in the past, managed heaps of campaigns get fired over having a day out? Doesn't make sense.

There are more issues we should address than someone sending your 50 bucks 2 hours late.