<<  >> (p.63)
    Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3427041 times)

    • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 23, 2013, 09:01:57 PM
     #1241
    Once again Spoetnik. I do take source code submissions, bug reports with detailed information but not shit like this. Get off my lawn, once more.

    and do respect the GPL when you share binaries.

    github does indeed have a nice fork feature. And your fixes really should go upstream into pooler's cpuminer. Suit yourself.

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 23, 2013, 09:13:24 PM
     #1242
    i will install and benchmark the 780Ti once my son is asleep. He is also the reason for slow development from May till November, lol ;-)

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 05:39:15 AM
    Last edit: November 24, 2013, 05:55:38 AM by cbuchner1
     #1243
    One Gigabyte GTX 780Ti, cudaminer.exe 32 bit executable

    because with 100% TDP and 82 Degrees Celsius temperature cap I was running into temperature throttling all the time, I used these settings: 105% TDP allowance, 92 Degrees max - but boost clock offset and memory clock offset remained at 0:

    -H 1 -l T30x16 -i 0 -m 1    430 kHash/s  (varies between 420 and 443 kHash/s)

    -l T102x4 is decent as well: 420 kHash/s
    -l T15x24 is also a decent launch config, but slightly worse than T102x4.

    The card performs well within expectations I'd say!

    Here's a part of my initial autotuning with the Titan kernel:

    Code:
    [2013-11-24 06:26:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti with compute capability 3.5
    [2013-11-24 06:26:33] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 1
    [2013-11-24 06:26:34] GPU #0: Given launch config 'T' does not validate.
    [2013-11-24 06:26:34] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
    [2013-11-24 06:26:36]        x1    x2    x3    x4    x5    x6    x7    x8
                                 x9    x10   x11   x12   x13   x14   x15   x16
                                 x17   x18   x19   x20   x21   x22   x23   x24
    [2013-11-24 06:26:36]   1:  2.0|  3.8|  5.8|  8.7| 10.4| 12.5| 14.9| 16.7|
                               18.0| 20.0| 21.6| 23.0| 25.0| 24.9| 28.2| 30.7|
                               30.2| 32.0| 33.2| 34.9| 34.8| 33.0| 35.0| 33.9 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:37]   2:  3.8|  7.0| 13.1| 17.1| 20.9| 25.0| 28.6| 33.4|
                               36.8| 40.0| 43.1| 48.0| 48.9| 53.8| 56.5| 61.4|
                               59.3| 64.0| 67.6| 69.8| 70.7| 71.6| 76.1| 78.1 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:38]   3:  7.2| 12.3| 16.0| 21.7| 28.8| 32.0| 25.8| 52.4|
                               56.3| 61.3| 64.7| 70.5| 51.3| 55.2| 64.5| 83.8|
                               83.0| 86.4| 92.7| 97.6|108.0|111.2|118.3|121.3 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:39]   4: 10.1| 18.3| 26.8| 35.7| 43.6| 52.4| 59.7| 69.8|
                               75.1| 81.7| 89.9| 98.0|101.9|109.7|112.9| 80.3|
                              120.9|130.4|135.1|144.9|141.5|148.2|154.9|158.9 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:41]   5: 12.0| 21.3| 32.0| 42.7| 52.2| 61.3| 73.0| 81.7|
                               88.2| 96.0|107.8|117.5|124.8|129.2|138.5|150.6|
                              148.4|154.3|165.8|174.5|168.0|182.1|184.0|192.0 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:42]   6: 12.8| 20.6| 30.9| 47.0| 49.7| 75.1| 85.8|100.2|
                              108.0|117.5|129.3|141.1|144.0|161.3|166.1|177.2|
                              178.0|185.1|192.0|209.4|198.3|211.2|217.2|226.6 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:43]   7: 16.0| 28.6| 44.8| 58.4| 73.0| 72.0| 94.1| 97.7|
                              118.6|115.9|154.0|168.0|174.7|184.5|193.8|179.2|
                              146.5|152.1|160.6|200.6|220.5|227.4|237.8|244.3 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:44]   8: 18.3| 35.7| 53.6| 71.4| 87.3|104.7|114.4|130.7|
                              141.1|156.7|169.0|180.7|192.0|202.9|221.5|236.3|
                              229.0|242.5|260.6|264.8|264.4|277.0|284.9|292.6 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:46]   9: 21.1| 38.4| 57.6| 75.1| 93.9| 97.8|116.3|119.2|
                              129.6|160.0|172.8|203.3|220.2|232.6|244.5|256.0|
                              257.7|272.8|283.0|303.1|292.6|306.6|315.4|329.1 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:47]  10: 23.4| 42.7| 64.0| 87.3| 98.0|125.2|143.0|163.4|
                              176.3|174.5|195.5|195.2|226.9|220.3|252.6|289.8|
                              296.7|303.1|314.5|325.4|240.0|247.0|253.8|264.8 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:48]  11: 23.5| 43.1| 64.6| 86.2|103.5|134.8|164.3|183.6|
                              202.2|215.5|232.3|248.5|254.2|278.9|288.0|307.2|
                              309.5|322.2|340.0|357.9|346.5|363.0|373.6|384.0 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:50]  12: 28.1| 51.2| 76.8|102.4|125.2|144.0|171.6|192.0|
                              207.3|221.5|207.7|246.8|234.0|248.1|288.0|335.1|
                              331.9|351.4|371.0|377.7|378.0|389.9|401.4|412.6 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:51]  13: 30.4| 55.5| 83.2|110.9|132.8|159.3|182.0|212.4|
                              224.6|244.7|269.2|288.0|300.4|329.6|292.5|338.4|
                              312.0|325.6|370.5|416.0|409.5|409.8|422.1|421.8 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:52]  14: 24.4| 39.5| 60.2|109.7|131.8|155.1|180.9|206.8|
                              246.8|268.8|289.9|304.3|323.5|342.1|353.7|384.0|
                              380.8|396.6|405.3|420.0|415.0|410.6|429.3|430.1 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:54]  15: 35.1| 65.5| 93.9|125.2|156.5|180.0|210.0|240.0|
                              254.1|276.9|273.1|303.1|288.0|336.0|322.4|365.7|
                              394.8|405.0|420.9|411.4|420.0|422.4|432.9|434.7 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:55]  16: 37.5| 68.3| 98.0|130.7|153.6|173.9|199.1|231.8|
                              234.3|260.3|264.0|283.6|285.2|302.9|295.4|315.1|
                              232.1|242.5|240.2|246.7|231.2|247.5|264.6|253.3 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:57]  17: 41.8| 74.2|106.4|138.9|166.5|134.1|149.3|170.7|
                              212.9|259.0|256.4|283.8|282.9|298.6|307.9|334.7|
                              253.4|264.6|272.0|282.6|275.3|284.9|291.0|300.1 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:26:58]  18: 44.3| 78.5|115.2|150.3|180.0|211.6|232.6|260.8|
                              272.8|297.9|301.7|324.0|325.5|340.7|338.8|347.8|
                              261.1|269.3|280.6|291.6|281.3|291.3|301.1|310.6 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:27:00]  19: 44.5| 79.3|116.4|155.2|178.8|214.6|236.4|260.6|
                              278.2|299.0|304.0|331.6|329.3|349.8|344.1|360.3|
                              272.0|284.2|296.2|282.8|283.7|273.0|300.7|310.4 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:27:01]  20: 37.6| 85.3|120.0|163.4|188.2|202.1|227.8|256.0|
                              265.8|290.9|306.1|324.5|332.8|351.4|355.5|372.3|
                              286.3|295.4|307.8|316.0|316.2|320.0|330.8|337.6 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:27:03]  21: 49.2| 80.6|106.1|144.0|183.3|201.6|261.3|298.7|
                              288.0|320.0|250.6|268.8|277.3|285.1|353.7|364.4|
                              289.2|302.4|307.6|320.0|317.1|324.9|347.3|350.6 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:27:05]  22: 52.8| 98.2|137.7|183.6|211.2|258.6|273.8|318.8|
                              322.2|357.9|363.0|372.7|366.1|386.5|384.0|395.2|
                              310.8|320.8|338.6|347.6|339.8|348.0|363.8|367.3 kH/s
    [2013-11-24 06:27:06]  23: 55.2| 96.0|138.0|184.0|212.3|254.8|281.0|315.4|
                              325.8|361.9|368.0|384.0|382.7|404.1|401.4|406.0|
                              305.2|315.4|325.2|338.4|336.0|323.8|338.5|356.8 kH/s

    and cudaminer running....
    Code:
              *** CudaMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner ***
                         This is version 2013-11-20 (alpha)
            based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
                   Cuda additions Copyright 2013 Christian Buchner
               My donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm

    [2013-11-24 06:45:03] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
    [2013-11-24 06:45:03] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.mine-litecoin.com
    [2013-11-24 06:45:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti with compute capability 3.5
    [2013-11-24 06:45:21] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 1
    [2013-11-24 06:45:21] GPU #0: using launch configuration T30x16
    [2013-11-24 06:45:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 15360 hashes, 24.97 khash/s
    [2013-11-24 06:45:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 1505280 hashes, 443.09 khash/s
    [2013-11-24 06:46:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 26588160 hashes, 422.86 khash/s
    [2013-11-24 06:47:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 22118400 hashes, 420.85 khash/s
    [2013-11-24 06:47:30] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 4008960 hashes, 437.49 khash/s
    [2013-11-24 06:48:31] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 26250240 hashes, 432.49 khash/s

  • Spiffy_1
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 235
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 07:22:33 AM
     #1244
    Like the program.. It just doesn't want to play nice with my gtx 460 and 560.. Stratum disconnects all the time... Hope you nail it down soon.
    If you like what I've posted, mine for me on whatever algo you like on www.zpool.ca for a minute using my bitcoin address: 1BJJYPRcRPzTEfByCwkeJ8SCBcrnGD1nhL

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 02:33:02 PM
    Last edit: November 24, 2013, 03:39:15 PM by cbuchner1
     #1245
    Quote from: Spiffy_1 on November 24, 2013, 07:22:33 AM
    Like the program.. It just doesn't want to play nice with my gtx 460 and 560.. Stratum disconnects all the time... Hope you nail it down soon.

    My guess is that your pool is currently acting flaky. Sometimes this is because their servers are overloaded, other times it may be a database issue, and occasionally it is a DOS attack on the pool or their networking infrastructure.

    Just change pools temporarily to see if the problem goes away.

  • Spewup2003
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 6
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 05:55:31 PM
     #1246
    Hi all hopefully somone can help im having real trouble with my card its a msi GTX 560ti if i let cudaminer auto detect it crashes after about 5 mins and restarts my pc.
    has anyone managed to get a stable batch file for my card?

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 07:34:55 PM
     #1247
    Quote from: Spewup2003 on November 24, 2013, 05:55:31 PM
    has anyone managed to get a stable batch file for my card?

    I always launched my 560Ti with -i 0 -C 1 -l F32x4

    I've now replaced it with something faster....

    Christian

  • Schleicher
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 675
    Merit: 514



    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 07:41:51 PM
     #1248
    Quote from: Spewup2003 on November 24, 2013, 05:55:31 PM
    Hi all hopefully somone can help im having real trouble with my card its a msi GTX 560ti if i let cudaminer auto detect it crashes after about 5 mins and restarts my pc.
    Only with autodetect?
    https://git.io/vFQv6

  • Spewup2003
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 6
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 07:50:01 PM
     #1249
    thanks for replys ill try those settings out now thanks and yes its only with auto detect i dont know enough about it to start fiddling with things lol

  • shiro100
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 12
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 08:08:12 PM
     #1250
    Currently getting 180-190kH/s on my 660Ti (not OC) with this setup:
    cudaminer.exe -H 1 -d 0 -i 0 -C2 -l K14x14

    on 64bit cudaminer it is slightly slower and im getting 160kH/s

  • Spewup2003
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 6
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 08:17:16 PM
     #1251
    im using the x64 one should i try the x86 one?

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 24, 2013, 08:42:06 PM
     #1252
    Quote from: Spewup2003 on November 24, 2013, 08:17:16 PM
    im using the x64 one should i try the x86 one?

    try both when in doubt. The 64bit version seems to handle the Kepler kernel somewhat slower than the 32 bit version. Still need to figure out why that is. I haven't experienced any difference with the Fermi kernels on my system.

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 11:24:03 AM
     #1253
    Quote from: shiro100 on November 24, 2013, 08:08:12 PM
    Currently getting 180-190kH/s on my 660Ti (not OC) with this setup:
    cudaminer.exe -H 1 -d 0 -i 0 -C2 -l K14x14
    on 64bit cudaminer it is slightly slower and im getting 160kH/s

    It's very similar for me. Interesting launch config by the way. I shall try that one.

    Maybe the 64 bit compiled kernel version is running into a register limitation, as pointers are then 64bit and require 2 registers each. I can compare the resulting PTX code to verify the assumption.

  • Kergekoin
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 546
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 03:05:51 PM
     #1254
    Heres my best settings for GTX 780

    cudaminer.exe -i 0 -l K42x6 -C 2 -o stratum+tcp://yourpoolIP:port -O account:pass

    I did some research and tried a lot of different settings. Those are the best.

    Card runs 1150/1800 and gets avg 360kh/s
    ******  NB! The links below are affiliate - friend type links, which bring additional benefits both, to you and me  ******
    Binance - Best Crypto Trading Platform          CoinBase - Fastest way from FIAT to Crypto
    Windscribe - The quickest and easyest way to secure and anonymize your internet traffic

  • cbuchner1 (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 04:12:03 PM
     #1255
    Quote from: Kergekoin on November 25, 2013, 03:05:51 PM
    Heres my best settings for GTX 780
    cudaminer.exe -i 0 -l K42x6 -C 2 -o stratum+tcp://yourpoolIP:port -O account:pass
    Card runs 1150/1800 and gets avg 360kh/s

    Interesting. I should also try to autotune the Kepler kernel on my 780 Ti. Maybe I get a few extra kHash/s out.
    Did you allow 100% TDP, or more?

    Your settings should scale to the 780 Ti  as  15/12 * 360 kHash = 450 kHash according to the number of enabled SMX engines. But then of course there's also the thermal and power (TDP) limitation which can ruin the day.

  • CygnusX1
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 11
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 07:20:42 PM
     #1256
    I am only getting about 136 KH/s from my K5000s. I've tried many different settings and autotune but that is the best I get.

    It is unfortunate because I have 3 of them and am about to get 3 K6000s. Surely these cards should be capable of much better performance?

  • Schleicher
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 675
    Merit: 514



    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 08:00:31 PM
     #1257
    Quote from: cbuchner1 on November 25, 2013, 11:24:03 AM
    Maybe the 64 bit compiled kernel version is running into a register limitation, as pointers are then 64bit and require 2 registers each.
    I don't think that's the reason.
    On my GTX660 the 64bit version is just as fast as the 32bit version.
    64bit:
    Code:
    [2013-11-25 20:53:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 with compute capability 3.0
    [2013-11-25 20:53:13] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 2D, single-alloc: 1
    [2013-11-25 20:53:13] GPU #0: using launch configuration K10x16
    [2013-11-25 20:53:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 5120 hashes, 14.59 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:53:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 875520 hashes, 132.09 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:54:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 5396480 hashes, 133.24 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:54:00] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 133.24 khash/s (yay!!!)
    32bit:
    Code:
    [2013-11-25 20:56:14] GPU #0: using launch configuration K10x16
    [2013-11-25 20:56:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 5120 hashes, 0.12 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:56:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 10240 hashes, 78.76 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:56:36] Stratum detected new block
    [2013-11-25 20:56:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 2856960 hashes, 132.79 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:56:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660, 3092480 hashes, 132.02 khash/s
    [2013-11-25 20:56:59] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 132.02 khash/s (yay!!!)
    Maybe there's a difference between AMD and Intel CPU?
    https://git.io/vFQv6

  • Kergekoin
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 546
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 08:26:23 PM
     #1258
    Quote from: cbuchner1 on November 25, 2013, 04:12:03 PM
    Quote from: Kergekoin on November 25, 2013, 03:05:51 PM
    Heres my best settings for GTX 780
    cudaminer.exe -i 0 -l K42x6 -C 2 -o stratum+tcp://yourpoolIP:port -O account:pass
    Card runs 1150/1800 and gets avg 360kh/s

    Interesting. I should also try to autotune the Kepler kernel on my 780 Ti. Maybe I get a few extra kHash/s out.
    Did you allow 100% TDP, or more?

    Your settings should scale to the 780 Ti  as  15/12 * 360 kHash = 450 kHash according to the number of enabled SMX engines. But then of course there's also the thermal and power (TDP) limitation which can ruin the day.

    Im running custom bios from overclock.net GTX780 forum topic. This allowes me way higher Power limit. With card at 1150/1800 1.13v i only have 55% of my power limit used. So TDP limit isnt any problem.
    My card is Gigabyte WF3. So cooling is also no problem.
    ******  NB! The links below are affiliate - friend type links, which bring additional benefits both, to you and me  ******
    Binance - Best Crypto Trading Platform          CoinBase - Fastest way from FIAT to Crypto
    Windscribe - The quickest and easyest way to secure and anonymize your internet traffic

  • Spewup2003
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 6
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 09:23:47 PM
     #1259
    still had no real joy with this but iv just won a ati 5870 on ebay should i get a good deal better hash rate than 70-90Kh/s?

  • shiro100
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 12
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 25, 2013, 10:15:43 PM
     #1260
    Quote from: cbuchner1 on November 25, 2013, 11:24:03 AM
    Quote from: shiro100 on November 24, 2013, 08:08:12 PM
    Currently getting 180-190kH/s on my 660Ti (not OC) with this setup:
    cudaminer.exe -H 1 -d 0 -i 0 -C2 -l K14x14
    on 64bit cudaminer it is slightly slower and im getting 160kH/s

    It's very similar for me. Interesting launch config by the way. I shall try that one.

    Maybe the 64 bit compiled kernel version is running into a register limitation, as pointers are then 64bit and require 2 registers each. I can compare the resulting PTX code to verify the assumption.
    I found it somewhere on the net :-)
    With other configs, I have only 80-150kh/s, dont know why. People here have more kh/s than my GPU. With this config, it it running better.

    Quote from: Schleicher on November 25, 2013, 08:00:31 PM
    Maybe there's a difference between AMD and Intel CPU?
    Maybe...I have Phenom II x4 955 3.2Ghz. When mining, it is utilized about 30%.
    Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 1135 »
      Print  
Page 62
Viewing Page: 63

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com