A bit of research on Fermi performance with the new X-perimental kernel (Dave Andersen's work ported over to Fermi)
GTX 560Ti 1280MB: 0.83 kHash/s with -X 8x1 <--- the low VRAM is really hurting
GT 630 4GB VRAM: 0.72 kHash/s <--- low cost, low performance. The RAM doesn't help

GTX 660 OEM 4GB VRAM: 1.25 kHash/s <--- that is one strange OEM part, I must say.
The new code is about 50% faster then the existing Fermi kernel for scrypt-jane. But I do get occasional
validation errors on Fermi + Kepler when I enable -C 1 or -C 2. Strange. Hence avoid Fermi parts like the
plague if you intend to do scrypt-jane.
In comparison.
A GT 640 (GK107) 4GB at stock clocks will do something in the range of 1.65 kHash/s. This is somewhat less than I expected
because my GT750M laptop part (same chip) delivers 2.1 kHash/s.
A GT 640 (GK208) 1GB GDDR5 manages to do 1.25 kHash/s with mild overclock. Again the low VRAM is hurting.
I will be getting more Kepler parts for comparison. GTX 650, GTX 650Ti (not the Boost version) with 2GB each.
Christian
Could you please give me your settings for the 750M? Using the same card (probably? got a 4GB DDR3 one) but so far i only manage to get ~1.10k out of it.