I have requested a refund of my shipping.

I pay for next day and I won't see my item for 6-7days from the time it left.

On top of that all the BTC I could have mined in 5 days!!

One Saturn is lagging after a day of burn-in

Let me know how it goes.  As you know, I'm in the exact same boat.

I have a November order that I'm very close to refunding.  I'm tired of this broken-record, fumble on the 1 yard line bullshit.  "Oops, sorry!".

I never accept the "compare to BFL" argument, because BLF are crooks who should be in prison. If they were in prison, either KNC would have delivered by 15th or never made a promise they could not keep. They would not risk being late if lateness meant financial ruin/prison.

But it seems everyone is willing to say "could be worse, could be 1 year" and that just gives KNC an out.

I don't. They stated 15th as a cold hard fact, an absolute. And it slips by hour by hour, day by day. They feed bullshit figures to customers on 9th that there are only about 1000 units left to produce. Never mind my calculations above, they have put in their newsletter that have produced 805 in 2 days of production. There is bullshit and lies being fed to us Phoenix1969. It's not so hard for you, as you have your three machines there working for you. Would you be so cool if you had none and time was heading towards another massive difficulty change?

ok, I agree with this... to a point.   I Honestly do believe they thought they could get me the miners when they said they would, and shiz happenz....  and I didn't enjoy the way we were kept in the dark.  But I don't believe they ever just straight lied to me.
Remember... I had one for "September Delivery" too

Too many peeps in here were bashing UPS
they made a decision based on customer response.

Dhl route to Hawaii so far.....

https://i.imgur.com/E4TToWx.jpg

Not lagging by much, 261GH/s, 237GH/s, 275GH/s.  You're using 0.96?  I don't have those cgminer stats reported with 0.95.

My Mercury hasn't hit 100GH/s but seems to have settled in around mid-90's according to cgminer.  Likely not the ASIC module fault as I tried going with a cheap 360 watt switching supply of a kind I'm having good success with powering a blade.  I went to 2 of the supplies in parallel even tho the  two supplies are only drawing 143 watts at the wall and bertmod reports DC/DC power 94watts.  I'll go back to one 360 watt supply and add some tantalum capacitors then after letting it run for a while I'll upgrade to 0.96.  Although I've heard that if one's system isn't doing well on 0.95, going to 0.96 isn't a help.  More than a third hardware errors.

 KnC 0:                | 104.0G/94.74Gh/s | A:91699 R:323 HW:33892 WU:1412.1/m

ASIC Board Info
4 Temperature sensor: 34.0 C

Die ID Cores ON Cores OFF %
0 44 4 91.7
1 39 9 81.2
2 35 13 72.9
3 38 10 79.2
DC/DC ID ON/OFF Status Input Voltage Output Voltage Output Current
0 ON OK 11.7 V 0.747 V 33.6 A (25.1 W)
1 No DC/DC detected
2 ON OK 11.9 V 0.748 V 31.7 A (23.7 W)
3 No DC/DC detected
4 ON OK 11.7 V 0.741 V 30.1 A (22.3 W)
5 No DC/DC detected
6 No DC/DC detected
7 ON OK 11.8 V 0.738 V 32.2 A (23.8 W)
 


If mine were running as well as your slowest, it would be 118.5GH/s.

+10000000000000