1.) Mathematics on caps must be way more clear as to what your top tier cap is. If you have not already worked this cap out I cannot understand how it's viable firstly as a product and as an ICO - even with a flexible cap you must work out forward caps.

2.) Who holds the address that can deploy more tokens?

3.) Who holds the address that can stop transfer of tokens and otherwise?

4.) Who and what specific definitions are these accounts under - is it one person of multiple people?

5.) Who is auditing this cap scale if there is no scale in the first place. Please break down in simple mathematical terms what are you scales and project scales.

6.) What are the current problems in this smart contract that needs changing apart from the issues that were pointed out? For you to transfer and migrate to a new smart contract.

7.) Does the above create a new level of token issuance?

8.) Knee Jerk reactions are not a part of the due diligence process - what is part of due diligence is processing the smart contract you and your team made.

9.) With regard to offchain transactions how is this verified if you are not using the blockchain technology itself? Again questions must be asked about this.

10.) Why is there a switch in the emission address? What is the rationale for this - this address should be owned by the team or otherwise - that is why who holds it is extremely important.

11.) No-one has framed you as malicious or untrustworthy, the due diligence has been done on code. Code is what you create it is not about personal opinion or otherwise. Personally I really liked the Humaniq project until this issue was brought to me. The reason code is open source is because there should be audits on it to protect the crypto community your userbase and otherwise.

12.) If you want to go with a centralized distribution model thats fine with complete control of your team and organizational members - but please announce this because that in itself is not decentralization.

13.) Why not use a independant escrow for cap baselines.

14.) Why no 3rd party audit of this smart contract before launching and otherwise?

I am sorry if these questions offend. I love the Ethereum community and what people are building. I am sorry if you had people ask you serious questions about distribution and otherwise - these are fair asks nothing about previous due diligence or users asking questions is unfair in a decentralized community.

It's ridiculous. Let's say scam, do you think idiot enough to make such a conversation on twitter?

Note: every ICO can scam. There is.