@Annabelle75
What you are saying really makes no sense at all? Exscudo sold DOT (old) for $90 then supported the split. So if you had DOT bought at $90 each would x100 then reduce value to .90c each (same thing) now at
Ah, thanks for the update, and yes I didn't know they split, polkadot hasn't been on my radar because...
@cryptocolumbus1978 Bitcoin and ETH have been. The funding for my exscudo investment came from a large ETH mining farm I built from leftover cluster computing and bitcoin equipment (remember ASICs being the death knell for GPUs in BTC?). I had already retired before mining, so lucky in that respect -- not a lot of women get out of tech early. Which I only mention because it means two things: I have the resources to follow through and hold Exscudo accountable and 2) You're correct, in this, I'm a PITA because in addition to the means, I have the time and will to effect punitive measures as Exscudo were systematically unlawful and abusive in projecting their coding impotence as my problem.
So, yes, now I will to force disclosure of how much they paid to speak at events, travel, used for personal gain, etc. While it seems the DOT offer was nice, we can all agree Exscudo is an utter failure, while projects like DOT and ATOM are revolutionary on top of the brilliance of BTC and ETH. The difference is a focus on quality code, not personal gain.
