Posting this to clarify science.
To start, I am NOT in favor of mandatory vax for many reasons, mostly associated with freedom of choice in an unclear environment.

Having said that what you posted (which is likely to be true) does not really apply from the sequence of events perspective.

Sequence one: you are not vaxxed, your chance of dying is 11/1000 per year. Yes, for 989 people who survived, they might have a pretty good immune conditioning, but about 3 times more people died.
Sequence two: you are vaxxed, your chance of dying is 3.5-4.2/1000 per year. Your immune status is probably less effective, but less people died, statistically (at least from what i found).

Data:
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-by-vaccination
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/covid-19-vaccinated-individuals-had-lower-non-covid-19-death-rates

In my extended family three people (unvaxxed) died. They were not young (therefore their risk was much higher), but died from COVID for sure. One died before vaccines were available, but two others did not want to be vaccinated.

However, it is also possible that in the future vax status would matter little if strains like the current one would break through easily.
As you can see on the graphs in the first link, death rates 'advantage' of vaxxed vs not vaxxed is declining (there is a "hump"), but still quite significant.

OT(lol): what about that bitcoin....up 2.5% today...wowza!

Maybe because chinese miners sold a lot of BTC at the top(s), to pay relocation operations.
Now they're getting their reserves back at a discount?
Mining datacenter relocation for free  

I am NOT saying we should not argue against a foolish point.  And particularly we should when the opinion is actually DUMB.  I am not even saying that we cannot be rude at times.

In your above example you actually make an argument. 

It is when someone just says something like "YOU ARE AN ANTIVAXER IDIOT", or "YOU ARE A GOVERNMENT SHILL".  That is not sufficient in my opinion.  But once you start giving an actual argument I think you are back on the path.  I personally have no problem with us discussing this here too since it is indirectly related to Bitcoin price.  But I am aware many people do NOT want that topic here...

Many of the arguments boil down to "You believe something other than me because you are a moron".  A recent cartoon basically made that point.

Guys, can we get back to the actually proven science and math of bitcoin's failure and its confirmed dismal price future?

2-CBTC?

$41k here we come!  LOL

D'oh, I think your ass just broke the rulez.

https://twitter.com/Cointelegraph/status/1480957062880264193?s=20

The pump for Ant thing where did it start ? At the WO ? Many lurkers are following us 

I swear we invented the "Bart" concept as well.  Speaking of which I am looking forward to the completion of this reverse bart... maybe soon!

I thought it was you who invented it... but at least you liked it enough to keep spreading it.

@cAPSLOCK Bart, hmm, it's from back when BitMEX was  number one. I did see it here first, but it doesn't mean much of course, since here is my first source anyway.

(Some keen WO searcher might be of help for such important matters. Hm, this could be worth a shot.)

@JJG I heard that those who invented "pump for ants" and "bart/debart" are shitcoiners in disguise and are here to destroy the WO. I wonder, who are they? If we only knew, they could be properly instructed and batslapped... O:-)