Are you looking for this one:

https://aggr.trade/

(Just thought because you mentioned "sound")

HTH

AFAIK, NATO is not accepting new member states which are at war or have part of their territory occupied. 

Correct, neither Ukraine nor Georgia will become members any time soon, Russia will make sure that never happens by keeping low scale border conflicts going for ever.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/el-salvador-imf-nayib-bukele-central-american-b2004625.html


El Salvador angrily rejects IMF call to drop Bitcoin use

Treasury Minister Alejandro Zelaya angrily said that “no international organization is going to make us do anything, anything at all.”

PISS AWAY on JJG !!!


As I said before, BTCiTcoin and some other 2-3 crypto WILL BE LOCKED IN A VAULT !!! ... and never used directly, but only rarely. It will be used as a side-app for fools that believe banks will empower those apps with the actual coins. But it will be a thing like physical gold backing fiat, meaning that who knows if the bank actually owns what they say, they could show fake wallets.      

You missed a few tiny details, such as Crimea being a part of Ukraine at the time (thus they wouldn't "take over"), complete lack of sense or purpose for the supposed slaughtering, and the referendum being preceded by Russian occupation/annexation. It was not "legal" in any resonable sense of that word, but Russian autocrats typically aren't concerned with pesky details like sovereignty of other countries so what can you expect.

1. The Russians were leasing the naval base in Crimea, so they were allowed to be there. legally. There was no occupation.
2. Crimea historically never truly belonged to Ukraine. Especially since the Crimea handover was unconstitutional.
3. If you're going to go as far back as the USSR to point fingers, then you might as well go further and tell me about the crimes of Ivan The Terrible and pin that on modern Russia as well.

As I already mentioned, the Russians were already there. What did you expect them to do? Sit back or retreat while the temporary government in Kiev would decide to use army and aviation to restore control against Pro-Russian Separatists the same way as they did in Donbass area? Or was that not what you would refer to as "bloodshed"?

The Russians decided to protect their own people. And to give them a choice. The Crimeans made their choice. After a coup d'etat the constitution validity is suspended so the referendum was a valid expression of public opinion. And if you think they are now all keeping quiet about their true thoughts because they fear Putin, then you are mistaken. Im not hearing anyone complaining. The Uyghurs in China had their mouths sown shut by the CCP. Yet we heard a lot of brave Uyghurs complaining about how they were being treated, despite being threatened with death and camps.

You seem to have swallowed the western propoganda of Putin being Hitler reincarnated, hook line and sinker.

Here is a video you should look into, if you want to inform yourself: Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer
 

Restore control from what? Both Crimea and Donbass were part of Ukraine. There wouldn't have been anything to "restore" if Russia didn't invade.

I bet you didn't apply the same contrived logic to e.g. Chechnya.


So what's next, Brighton Beach? Every country has minorities and many have majority-minority areas and can still manage to respect each other's sovereignty, except Russia.