~
~Of course that is an extreme example but all throughout history those in positions of power use false flags all the time to push agendas of control.
Your example is not extreme, and there are still more things to happen that are not being discussed. 
  Maybe they've even taken control, and they're just waiting for the right time to announce it. 
  that would be an exaggerated example.
You can believe whatever you like in regards to the extent to which you believe anyone controls bitcoin, or they would like to create the impression that they control it and/or they would like to try to control it... and also you can figure out how much to invest into bitcoin based on your own presumptions that may or may not be correct and have fun staying poor if you are failing/refusing to recognize the paradigm changing nature of bitcoin and at the same time wanting to plug it into known categories so you can come to simple and lame-ass explanations in regards to what you believe bitcoin to be, how it got to where it is and where you believe it might be going.
But how so? Just because I expressed my opinion, I don't believe in his potential? If this fork really happens in 2027 as he proposes, nothing will change in I believe in its potential, I just believe it should be focused on security and value transfer. Since BRC20 I already think so, and I haven't changed my opinion about its potential., and I still say again, 'it's better for me to go fishing than to be reflecting bullshit,...
 but what about you, do you think it closes October above or below 114079?
(#)
Here it was raining these last days, but now the weather started to clear!
>

(/#)