When I asked questions on Reddit, the questions were constructive and not FUD. Not something that can be said about the FUD attack that started 2 months ago.
I told you once, and I will say it again - you are more than welcome to start a discussion, a debate, write about your concerns, or to criticize.
Just keep the facts straight.
What you're doing is using your own subjective viewpoint to determine what is and isn't FUD, then deleting based on that criteria. That would be fine, if you were an infallible, truly objective being. But you're not.
If I voice my concerns in the form of questions (leading or otherwise), that means people can give answers based on their own bias/hype/whatever, and my concerns aren't actually addressed. Just swept under the carpet, or justified with nonsense. What you're asking of me is to be a listener, and to not draw my own conclusions, or share my conclusions. The second I do that, and the conclusion is negative, you think it's FUD.
So it's fine for any discussion to lead to a positive conclusion, but you (and others) are not happy if a negative conclusion is reached.
You can deny that all you want, but it is evident in your actions.
This is all academic of course. I've moved my discussion to private messages, and I'm free to post my conclusions elsewhere. I understand that. This thread isn't the place for what I've tried to say.
But... I am not one of those trolls from 2 months ago. I've been more than reasonable.
That is all.
