Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.
In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
You're allowed to have your opinion, and Jon wasn't telling you not to. What concerns people is that you aren't providing a reasoning for your scores. Like, for instance we have a 0 in escrow. We signed an Escrow deal and will be having vetted third party professionals handle investors finances. After speaking with Sergey, I find it hard to believe he didn't mention this fact to you. However, you said that even after the interview your opinion hadn't changed. That's pretty strange.
Second of all, our roadmap is quite clear, and our main product where MobileGo will launch is completed. Our Mobile Store will launch before the end of the Crowdfund (like Jon said), meaning for perhaps the first time in crypto history investors don't have to wait months or even a year till after funding to see a product. They will be investing in something that has hit the market, so there's less speculation and concerns about failing to develop.
It's great that you're taking the time to review projects like MobileGo, but saying you have a team that makes decisions doesn't provide any clarity. For all anyone knows you could be making that up and you decide based on arbitrary information.
