So how can it be "more or less" legit when Mt.Gox did not produce the document.
I would imagine because it was produced by a consultant or somesuch working for an interested party.
If it was a consultant paid by Mt.Gox then that would mean Mt.Gox produced the document.
Anyway, he's trying to disassociate himself with his own proposal. That's what it look like.
Let's assume the numbers in the document are correct.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/209050732/MtGox-Situation-Crisis-Strategy-DraftClaims that everything is missing. THe 740K includes customer accounts and Mt.Gox accounts.
Then is the interview with Fox he says... "technically speaking, it is not lost yet, just temporarily unavailable"
In summary , he wants to keep the 740K BTC that is 'just temporarily unavailable'.
The story of the BTC keeps changing.
First it is, 740K missing dues to mallaebility exploit.
Now it is 740K just temporarily unavailable.
Anyway, the subpoena in NY will force details to be released.
I still can't buy the document having a goat on top of the mountains as a logo is real...
That seems too much for me...
hence everything else related to this document seems unlikely to be legit as well.
The Goat bought at lot of Goxxies with BTC he gained at pirates ponzi as a PPT ...as those ill -gotten gains are greeted
and even made by the allmighty MODS over here, you are going to be had with all your craptofuck-investments as the
majority of BTC´s is still not used by Africans being able to buy their stuff at e-bay rather by early adopter criminals fucking
themselves and everybody else over. Am I one of them? Sure as I sold my Goxxies for 72,5 cause I knew from experience
that the bouncing cat can sleep comfortably on Marks keyboard

Consequence: stop hoping and listening to BS....if BTC wants not to be used less and less...Mark needs to feel the heat now---
and those lame excuses from the other top-dog centralists why Mark is just a black sheep which will be allowed to ride in the sunset
should show you where your money went !!!!