and at this point the devs should make a decision about the exchanges they work with at all.
working with shit is causing shit.
why should any coin depend on bots and exchanges using bots to be on top? that is part f quality management.

Ya right.. I made the entire crypto market dump by myself... Most of this drop in value has had nothing to do with me at all. It has everything to do with all of the easy money crowd pulling out. I am still calling for 3k/4k Bitcoin and there is nothing to suggest that the downturn will stop despite a few bounces now and again. We are still firmly in the downtrend channel. My rants were more warning than anything else. I saw fundamental weakness in the market and I took steps to secure my gains from 2017. There is nothing wrong with that as far as I am concerned. As far as Bitcore goes... Was I wrong about anything at all? What you advocate for is keeping things secret. Governments keep things secret but that is what we are supposed to fighting against. We should always be as transparent as possible in this space. Know that I also didn't dump my bags without first warning everyone. Maybe this created panic but I thought it was fair for me to do so. This price movement was going to occur whether i held my fairly small 13.5k BTX bag or not.

Agreed but there would only be 50k-100k of daily volume reported without Bit-Z. Honestly, there are bots on almost every single exchange and I have noticed them on cryptopia, Bittrex, Bit-Z, etc. This is more a damned if you do or damned if you don't because if you don't have volume people automatically label you a shitcoin.

What a sharp decline from $49 to $5..!

It's all evident now that -  Bit-Z and Hitbtc both are totally useless.. One with their fake volume and the other with almost zero volume...

Only one exchange cryptopia, with real volume won't be be able to handle such inflation...

While all other alts are dying, it's of no wonder that BTX will follow the same...

Yet all cryptos no matter where they are being traded,, they are bathing with blood... Following the bearish trend..

Some extreme,  really extreme good exchanges are must for BTX survival in the near future...

Finally, I have no other way except holding.. So I am holding and I am not that much fool to sell for only $5..
    
                                 Long Live Bitcore

No I compromised significantly on the airdrop model since I wanted the originally promised model. I wanted all the coins to be dropped immediately and none of them going to BTC holders. There are now 8 million coins or so stuck in never never land and the rest has been airdropped over time in this slow and agonizing process of continually increasing inflation as the market also takes a downturn. I would rather have had one shocking event and then recover than to experience this fading away process. If you want you can go back to many many months ago and read my posts. I guess I was ranting just as much then as now. But there was another user than raised hell as well and it was actually his plan that won with ever increasing airdrops. I just facilitated it because some people thought I was being unfair by excluding what now is the current airdrop model. Obviously if we had proportionally dropped all of the coins in Oct/Nov all at once then the distribution would not be as wide but that can happen organically on the exchanges.

ok, then i am just asking you and the devs who is right at all: the shock at once or the slightly one. one side is not telling the truth obviously, but a large front has to pay the fees.

The evidence is on these very forums if you wish to go back and look. The model was changed multiple times. The first one had them dropping all of it to holders in the beginning of November, then they wanted to drop the majority of it to BTC holders, and the last iteration was simply the one that won from the community vote that I facilitated. It wasn't even my plan that won. I was trying to get the pain over with faster and to be honest I hated the idea of airdrops with a passion from the start but I love the other properties of this coin. The scaling debate was important at the time and this coin scales better than any other POW coin out there. POS can in some cases do significantly better but there are other questions in regards to security and also the need to stake that make POS not very viable.

hell, this is starting to be a circus. either you say yes or no, either you are part of a project or not. you seem to be talking away your role, and i still do not like the taste.

so whom was part of the decision of this model? can you please name nicknames?