Science theory ..
To tell the public it's fact to get money..
Scientist are the liars to get funds..
And how many scientist are QUACKS? the list below tells you
SO HOW RELIABLE was these scientist theories ..?
Well according to you 100%
And that's the trouble with some of you SCIENTIST YOUR FUCKING LIARS
to get FUNDED by government or private..MONEY MONEY MONEY..
So you say SCIENCE THEORY is fact to get monies ..
And many of your theories turn out to be a lie..
SO like i said SCIENCE THEORY IS NOT FACT so prove it to be FACT..
NOT a theory like these scientist below..WAS THEY 100% RELIABLE?..
One of the best aspects of science has always been its readiness to admit when it got something wrong. Theories are constantly being refigured, and new research frequently renders old ideas outdated or incomplete. But this hasnt stopped some discoveries from being hailed as important, game-changing accomplishments a bit prematurely. Even in a field as rigorous and detail-oriented as science, theories get busted, mistakes are made, and hoaxes are perpetrated. The following are ten of the most groundbreaking of these scientific discoveries that turned out to be resting on some questionable data. It is worth noting that most of these concepts are not necessarily wrong in the traditional sense; rather, they have been replaced by other theories that are more complete and reliable.
10. The Discovery of Vulcan
Vulcan was a planet that nineteenth century scientists believed to exist somewhere between Mercury and the Sun. The mathematician Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier first proposed its existence after he and many other scientists were unable to explain certain peculiarities about Mercurys orbit. Scientists like Le Verrier argued that this had to be caused by some object, like a small planet or moon, acting as a gravitational force. La Verrier called his hypothetical planet Vulcan, after the Roman god of fire. Soon, amateur astronomers around Europe, eager to be a part of a scientific discovery, contacted Le Verrier and claimed to have witnessed the mysterious planet making its transit around the Sun. For years afterward, Vulcan sightings continued to pour in from around the globe, and when La Verrier died in 1877, he was still regarded as having discovered a new planet in the solar system.
How it was Proven Wrong:
Without La Verrier acting as a cheerleader for Vulcans existence, it suddenly began to be doubted by many notable astronomers. The search was effectively abandoned in 1915, after Einsteins theory of general relativity helped to explain once and for all why Mercury orbited the Sun in such a strange fashion. But amateur stargazers continued the search, and as recently as 1970 there have been people who have claimed to see a strange object orbiting the sun beyond Mercury. Amusingly, the entire would-be discoverys greatest legacy today is that it inspired the name of the home planet of the character Spock from Star Trek.
9. Spontaneous Generation
Although it might seem a bit ludicrous today, for thousands of years it was believed that life regularly arose from the elements without first being formed through a seed, egg, or other traditional means of reproduction. The main purveyor of the theory was Aristotle, who based his studies on the ideas of thinkers like Anaximander, Hippolytus, and Anaxagoras, all of whom stressed the ways in which life could spontaneously come into being from inanimate matter like slime, mud, and earth when exposed to sunlight. Aristotle based his own ideas on the observation of the ways maggots would seemingly generate out of dead animal carcass, or barnacles would form on the hull of a boat. This theory that life could literally spring from nothing managed to persist for hundreds of years after Aristotle, and was even being proposed by some scientists as recently as the 1700s.
How it was Proven Wrong:
It was only with the adoption of the scientific method that many of the classical theories like spontaneous generation began to be tested. Once they were, they quickly crumbled. For example, famed scientist Louis Pasteur showed that maggots would not appear on meat kept in a sealed container, and the invention of the microscope helped to show that these same insects were formed not by spontaneous generation but by airborne microorganisms.
8. The Expanding Earth
Our modern understanding of the interior and behaviors of the Earth is strongly based around plate tectonics and the concept of subduction. But before this idea was widely accepted in the late 20th century, a good number of scientists subscribed to the much more fantastical theory that the Earth was forever increasing in volume. The expanding Earth hypothesis stated that phenomena like underwater mountain ranges and continental drift could be explained by the fact that the planet was gradually growing larger. As the globes size grew, proponents argued, the distances between continents would increase, as would the Earths crust, which would have explained the creation of new mountains. The theory has a long and storied past, beginning with Darwin, who briefly tinkered with it before casting it aside, and Nikola Tesla, who compared the process to that of the expansion of a dying star.
How it was Proven Wrong:
The expanding Earth hypothesis has never been proven wrong exactly, but it has been widely replaced with the much more sophisticated theory of plate tectonics. While the expanding Earth theory holds that all land masses were once connected, and that oceans and mountains were only created as a result of the planets growing volume, plate tectonics explains the same phenomena by way of plates in the lithosphere that move and converge beneath the Earths surface.
7. Phlogiston Theory
First expressed by Johan Joachim Becher in 1667, phlogiston theory is the idea that all combustible objectsthat is, anything that can catch firecontain a special element called phlogiston that is released during burning, and which makes the whole process possible. In its traditional form, phlogiston was said to be without color, taste, or odor, and was only made visible when a flammable object, like a tree or a pile of leaves, caught fire. Once it was burned and all its phlogiston released, the object was said to once again exist in its true form, known as a calx. Beyond basic combustion, the theory also sought to explain chemical processes like the rusting of metals, and was even used as a means of understanding breathing, as pure oxygen was described as dephlogistated air.
How it was Proven Wrong:
The more experiments that were performed using the phlogiston model, the more dubious it became as a theory. One of the most significant was that when certain metals were burned, they actually gained weight instead of losing it, as they should have if phlogiston were being released. The idea eventually fell out of favor, and has since been replaced by more sophisticated theories, like oxidation.
6. The Martian Canals
The Martian canals were a network of gullies and ravines that 19th century scientist mistakenly believed to exist on the red planet. The canals were first discovered in 1877 by Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli. After other stargazers corroborated his claim, the canals became something of a phenomenon. Scientists drew detailed maps tracing their paths, and soon wild speculation began on their possible origins and use. Perhaps the most absurd theory came from Percival Lowell, a mathematician and astronomer who jumped to the bizarre conclusion that the canals were a sophisticated irrigation system developed by an unknown intelligent species. Lowells hypothesis was widely discredited by other scientists, but it was also popularly accepted, and the idea managed to survive in some circles well into the 20th century.
How it was Proven Wrong:
Quite unspectacularly, the Martian canals were only proven to be a myth with the advent of greater telescopes and imaging technology. It turned out that what looked like canals was in fact an optical illusion caused by streaks of dust blown across the Martian surface by heavy winds. Several scientists had proposed a similar theory in the early 1900s, but it was only proven correct in the 1960s when the first unmanned spacecraft made flybys over Mars and took pictures of its surface.
Just tell us already that you are trolling because you really are doing a good job.
Trolling ? who is superman here? hero member ..
That means i speak my mind..
I can fly on this thread you cannot i am a HERO
..
popcorn1
Hero Member
*****
Online Online
Activity: 728
Trolling i don't know what you mean
..No i really don't ..
You do know what i say goes because it's the only way to make our world better..
You do know this planet is 1 big living thing IT'S ALIVE..
Scientist will now know SCIENCE THEORY is not fact ..
It's a THEORY yet to be proven to be a fact.
That way NO LIARS..
This is my world and you will do as i say YOU HAVE NO CHOICE
..
It's funny because you will think HOW
..If only you knew..
Don't worry i am fair and this world will be good if you follow if you don't we all die..
EVERYONE..
We are programmed by the EARTH and you will do as it tells you..
You have no control over what we do because it makes us do it..
And SCIENCE is one programme the EARTH programmed us to do..
IT MAKES US LIVE ON FOREVER..
We are little seeds human seeds EARTH SEEDS to expand into the UNIVERSE
it's why humans LOVE SPACE we feel we need to get out there ..HUMAN EARTH SEEDS
To make new planets to find new planets because like a seed it needs to be planted somewhere
else..
ALSO i wonder if we come from plant life and turned in to a creature ..
Because they say we have BANANA DNA ..
No your the BANANA just in case your thinking i am one
..
MY mind is thinks of the future i have to to invent something everyone wants..
The only way to be RICH ..LEGAL WAY to be rich anyways..
So my mind thinks about products of all kinds ..
And even sometimes i see a documentary on space it hurts because i am thinking you liars
It hurts my mind..
And so to all scientist A SCIENCE THEORY is not fact until you prove it to be so..
The whole meaning of even putting the word THEORY is so you can test and test to prove this theory to be fact..
Because they be no need to even use the word THEORY ..
Now i am giving you my THEORY on the word science theory AND i hold more substance than you do..
Because you say a theory is FACT when land or sea aliens or misty rock?
how humans come to be ..
And it's not like we have stopped theorising about how we come to be IS IT?..
I am sick of this PLANET WITH LIARS ..
Everyone is lying for MONEY..
And if you think about it when a scientist as a theory and says it's fact he is trying to get money or fame ..
When really he has not proved is theory to be fact..
What pushes scientists to lie? The disturbing but familiar story of ...
https://www.theguardian.com Science Stem cells
18 Feb 2015 - At least that's the theory. Carrel's chicken heart experiment shows how far science can stray from the scientific method. And the fault doesn't just..
SO LIKE I SAID..
Science theory because it has the word THEORY in it's sentence by the meaning of the word THEORY
it means to guess and test to prove what you say is FACT..
So in the 21ST century NOT the 18TH
You will use the word theory as
hypothesis, thesis, conjecture, supposition, speculation, postulation, postulate, proposition, premise, surmise, assumption, presumption, presupposition, notion, guess, hunch, feeling, suspicion; ..
And you use all these words to come to the TRUTH FACT in the science field you study..
The very word THEORY used in SCIENCE THEORY means..
hypothesis, thesis, conjecture, supposition, speculation, postulation, postulate, proposition, premise, surmise, assumption, presumption, presupposition, notion, guess, hunch, feeling, suspicion..
USE those word to come to a FACT when studying your known field..
