Evolution as you are explaining it is simply a string of changes. The word "evolution" might be a great word to explain this, but it mixes people up with the evolution that is impossible.

The evolution that is impossible is the string of changes that it takes to go from inanimate material, to life, to life as we know it today... without divine intervention.

The marvelous thing about what God has done is, God has given us (people) reasoning ability so that we can "evolve" things, like the string of changes that take us through philosophy, or the string of changes whereby we can make greater and more powerful weapons.

Well, of course that isn't all that there is in evolution. Bit abiogenesis is part of evolution. At least there are many evolutionists that say so. Perhaps you should write a book that corrects them, hey? I mean, evolution is your science fiction religion that you got hoaxed into. You might as well make your religion up how you like it, right.

What is Life?: How Chemistry Becomes Biology
By Addy Pross




Just some perpective to illustrate what can be meant by "low probability" and how "astonishing" it is to think life which is orders of magnitude more complex than a fridge would just popup like this out of the "primordial soup".

Not saying it's impossible, but just to weight the complexity and low probability of it.

Today people seem to have fascination for iPhone, consider google genius ( only using the tablet for a few week I want to hang à few of them),  but find it totally normal and natural that form of life popup like this with some natural chemistry. Kinda cognitive dissonance full throttle.


For me it still very basic metaphysics, and rather classic take on thermodynamics, he is not getting too wet on this one, but it already show something.


https://aeon.co/essays/paradoxes-of-stability-how-life-began-and-why-it-can-t-rest

The second insight is even more momentous. Evolution exhibits an identifiable driving force, a direction if you like, and this ‘teleological’ tendency acts at both the chemical and biological stages; that is, it operates both during, as well as after, what we think of as abiogenesis. Thus the purpose-driven character of life, the very thing that seemed to distinguish biology from the rest of nature, turns out not to be unique to life after all. Its beginnings are already discernible in certain inanimate syrstems, provided they are replicative and able to evolve. And this driving force can be described in strictly physical terms.

The evolution that you talk about is part of evolution theory. There is evolution within evolution theory, and there is evolution outside of evolution theory. They are different kinds of evolution.

Evolution outside of evolution theory is simply change with a fancier word.

Evolution within evolution theory is science fiction, because it doesn't exist outside of evolution theory.

The most simple, easy way to show that evolution inside evolution theory doesn't work outside of it, is to look at cause and effect. Natural selection doesn't exist in reality. Cause and effect dictates everything, and it operates according to the physics of the universe. In addition, this is common knowledge with all scientists, including evolution scientists.

The only selection that occurred was the selection that God made when He set cause and effect in place, and started it moving.

Most of scientist today come to this same conclusion.

Either

1. There is a force at play that we dont understand ( forget about thermodynamics ) , maybe it's too subtle for us to really see it, like relativity is almost invisible at our scale. Call it god, tao, dharma, newton of the blade of grass, monad, or whatever.

2. There are intelligent being who created life on earth millions years ago.


There is not really a way to explain evolution and life dynamic with bare newton or classic mechanics.

And anything based on Metaphysics/entelechy is logical dead end. All metaphysics when pushed lead to some form of monism. Or to a force beyond objects. It took 1500 years to the arab to swallow aristotle and make it monotheist, but al jabir did it. And liebniz finished the job. (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/#BeiSucFirCauUncThi ).

Neurology of "higher consciousness" tend to show this too. Otherwise there would be no evolutionary interest to neural plasticity. We would just have a dictionary of all objects prebuilt in our brains.

Atheism as a form of Aristotelian metaphysics or naturalism is actually illogical irrational.

Metaphysics is always arbitrary, and defender of philosophy or science based on this are always defending oligarchy.

http://wiki.c2.com/?ThereAreNoTypes  

It's why google non determinist algorithm are more efficient than things based on preterdemined ontologies.


https://youtu.be/s765wPKjNRk fat boy slim star 69

https://youtu.be/ub747pprmJ8 fat boy slim right here, right now

2 might imply there are some place in the universe where life formation can be explained by simple physics, due to some particular conditions.

We still have to find such place.

Its a bit like the plot in starcraft 2 legacy of the void with the xelnaga but I didn't finish it yet  


http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Xel%27naga

"The xel'naga were the first, born within the Void. Their sacred purpose was to cultivate life and perpetuate the Infinite Cycle."
- Hierarch Artanis(src)

Originating from the Void,[8] the xel'naga were incredibly long-lived even by protoss standards, but not immortal; eventually their species would come to an end. In the interest of survival they planned to create new xel'naga by uplifting two species. A pair of qualities was required and these were defined by the xel'naga as purity of essence and purity of form, and each uplifted species would be targeted for one of them. Over an extraordinarily long period of time, the two species would naturally come together and merge, forming the next generation of xel'naga and beginning the cycle anew.[9]

The Infinite Cycle
The cycle was repeated in numerous universes; at the start of a universe's creation, the xel'naga would take on physical form and enter the universe, seeding it with life.[8] The cycle repeated so many times that time itself was affected by it.[5]

And dna is made by who ?   it just poped there with science which is unable to understand it ?  

If you know about chemistry, you know plastic is "organic chemistry". ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_synthesis ).

It's made with petroleum.

It's just some biological waste put together in a baking thing.

It's only partially man made.

Without this biologic waste in petroleum, we dont know how to do plastic from scratch.

And the molecules involved with plastic is still very simple compared to dna, or most proteines.

And it require minimum 200 different proteines to come up with the most simple bacteria.

There 200 times more chance for a fridge to build itself up from petroleum than a bacteria.

Did you ever see a fridge building itself up from your car's oil tank ? Me neither.

And petroleum is already organic waste more advanced than simple molecule youd expect to find on a new planet.

But of course it's perfectly sane and scientific to think something 200 times more complex could build itself up like this.
 
There is more chance to do a sybil attack on the whole btc blockchain with your cell phone.

Everything is recycled sooner or latter if god wants

Prophet Abraham’s story with the birds is one of the most turned to stories in the Quran. The theme it evokes touches the soul of all of us who seek a kind of reassurance that satisfies our natural desires for both belief and proof. The Prophet Abraham (Ibrahim) asks: “My Lord, show me how You give life to the dead.” He said, “Do you not believe?” He said, “I do! But this is so my heart may be calm.” He said, “Then take four birds and draw them to you. Then place a part of them on each mountain. Then call them; they shall come to you in a rush. And know that indeed Allah is overpowering, all-wise” (Quran, 2:260).

If DNA is made by the earth, then the earth is smarter than scientists. Why? Because scientists can't make DNA, even though they might be close.

So, why do you keep on talking? You aren't even close. The scientists who barely know a tiny bit of what is going on, can't quite really make DNA. You know nothing.

Get lost. Oh wait. You are lost already. Get "loster."