<<  >> (p.51)
    Author Topic: DNotes 2.0 - Staking, CRISP Interest, DNotes Pay  (Read 148894 times)
    This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (3 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
    DNotes (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1932
    Merit: 1111


    DNotes


    View Profile WWW
    August 24, 2017, 05:29:57 PM
     #1001

    IRS Reportedly Bought Software to Uncover Bitcoin User Identities

    https://dcebrief.com/irs-reportedly-bought-software-to-uncover-bitcoin-user-identities/

    I am amazed that so many addresses have been linked to an identity, though they imply that with 'information'. When a bitcoin wallet makes a transaction, it defaults to emptying the source address and depositing any remainder after transaction and fees into a new address. It might seem reasonable to assume that that new address is held by the original wallet owner, but does that have to be the case?

    If I wanted to pay TeeGee 4BTC and he was willing to wear the fees. I could pay myself 6BTC from my address that held 10BTC and make the remainder go to an address held by TeeGee. Couldn't I?

    I understand wallets as a folder that these addresses are stored in, and I don't think the wallet leaves any prints on the addresses. So it seems to me that there is no way to know from a transaction, which wallets the addresses involved sit in. Maybe this is technically possible, but done so rarely that it is possible for the IRS to link transactions from the initial identified fiat exchange, right through to a final exit back into fiat currency again. But having information on 25% of all addresses seems rather high.

    And then there are all the other currencies. I could convert 10BTC to NOTE, pay the NOTE to TeeGee, and then he could convert that back to BTC. I understand that all blockchains keep a permanent record, and it would be conceivable to run software that interconnects those transactions, but processing all of that information wouldn't be cheap. Good luck to the IRS. Though, I'm sure in the future at some point, my phone will be able to do all that in the background while I play Tetris4D.

    Blockchain offers a level of privacy, but not complete anonymity. As far as I understand, they have developed programs to tie addresses together of the same wallet. Each wallet can generate a virtually unlimited amount of addresses, which you can receive cryptocurrency at each address. Those addresses are part of your wallet, and tied to your private key. However, to simplify things, you don't necessarily send transactions from each individual address, you send it from your wallet. The "change" as you mentioned is automatically sent back to your wallet.

    All this is fairly private, however when you send to say an exchange, or any third party that has additional information about you, that wallet and all your addresses could be tracked back to you eventually. Providing they have access to the information on the third party.

    Then there is the IP issue, if they can track who is updating the wallet, or on the network with that wallet and trace that back to you.

    Our focus in relation to privacy is that the user should have privacy. In such a way that a company or individual would be unable to track your information or buying habits without your consent. It is very private today, and transactions and information is as secure as you allow it to be and the third party services or merchants that you utilize. But like I mentioned earlier, it's not necessarily anonymous. You can be more private through how you use the wallets, using multiple receiving addresses, using multiple wallets, etc...


Page 50
Viewing Page: 51