Please ban user
F_Societys!
Many of their posts are heavily plagiarized, stolen articles misrepresented as their own. Said account is using text-spinning tools to avoid detection!
User was first mentioned in this thread:
Paraphrased articles, without providing links to originals.A few quick examples:
Copy:Ripple's latest trademark is Ripple Impact, which was filed with the USPTO on August 19. The trademark has now been approved by the government and added to the TRAM system on August 22, which hosts all US federal trademarks.
According to the attached documents of this trademark, Ripple Impact is supposed to facilitate the financing of various programs and services in the field of financial innovations in line with the functions of Xpring, Ripple's investment arm:
The Ripple Impact brand is expected to cover the Ripple Foundation's charitable services by carrying out fundraising activities, supplementary financing, capital improvement financing, scholarships and grants for courses and services of other companies in the field of financial technologies.
(archive)
Original:The latest trademark, "RIPPLE IMPACT," was filed on Aug. 19. It was accepted by the USPTO and then added to the TRAM system of all active federal trademark registrations on Aug. 22.
According to its description, the initiative will follow in the footsteps of Ripple's investment arm, Xpring, by providing funding to various programs and services in the realm of financial innovations:
RIPPLE IMPACT trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of charitable foundation services, namely, providing fundraising activities, supplemental funding, capital improvement funding, scholarships and financial assistance for programs and services of others in the field of financial technology.
Copy:The French branch of Just Eat online food ordering service has started accepting bitcoins for on-demand orders from more than 15,000 French restaurants. As it turns out, Justite uses the services of the Bitpay payment company to activate this feature.
The outbreak of the coronavirus and the requirement of quarantine regulators and social distancing rules have led to a growing wave of demand for online food ordering services. At the same time, the use of cash declined.
In an interview with the media, Gregory Raymond, author of the French publication, said:
Just eat is one of the main players in the food ordering and delivery industry in France, and its action to expand the acceptance of digital currencies can help to learn the use of these emerging currencies among members of society.
(
archive)
Original:Food delivery service Just Eat France has started accepting Bitcoin payments for orders placed from over 15,000 restaurants in the country. The delivery service is using Bitpay as its Bitcoin payment provider.
Home delivery services have been in high demand during the coronavirus pandemic, as lockdown orders and social distancing regulations have forced customers out of sit-down restaurants. At the same time, the use of cash is declining.
Just Eat is a major player in the delivery of meals in France; this initiative could help to democratize the use of cryptocurrencies among the general public, Gregory Raymond, writer for French publication Capital.fr, told Decrypt.
edit; two good reports and still not banned?!
Let me try one more time:
Copy:In 2014, Leah McGrath Goodman published a report in Newsweek claiming that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, a 64-year-old Japanese-American man from Southern California, was the creator of Bit[Suspicious link removed]dman claims that Doreen Nakamoto "implicitly" identified himself as Satoshi Nakamoto in an interview with Goodman; However, Doreen Nakamoto later vehemently denied any involvement in the creation of bitcoin.
McGrath Goodman is a distinguished reporter who has won awards in his career and has published articles in prestigious publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and the Guardian. In an interview with Anthony Pompliano, he explained that he now has new information about Nakamoto's identity and intends to write more about it.
(
archive)
Original:When it was understood that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, who was at the top of the agenda with the news he made in 2014, but 64-year-old Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto had nothing to do with Satoshi, the real creator of Bitcoin, a new Satoshi statement came from the journalist who caused an investigation against Newsweek.
As it will be remembered, Dorian Nakamoto, who was heavily influenced by the media due to the name resemblance at that time, stated that he had no contribution in the creation of Bitcoin, although he admitted his identity.
At the time, Leah McGrath Goodman, who made the news and published award-winning news in media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and The Guardian, participated in the podcast of Morgan Creek Digitals co-founder Anthony Pompliano and explained that she reached more information on the subject:
edit2; 4th time's the charm 
~ Stolen article from cointelegraph.com ✔
~ Text spinner used ✔
~ No link to source ✔
~ Multiple good reports against the user for plagiarism ✔
~ account is banned ✘
Copy:On August 30, a user posted on the GitHub website that 1,400 bitcoins had been skillfully hacked from his Electrum wallet. N-chain analysis of the incident shows that the hackers had an account in the Binance exchange, and that some of the transactions used to transfer these coins took place in St. Petersburg, Russia. The results of research on the Blockchain are usually more probable than conclusive.
Original:On Aug. 30, a Github user made a post about losing 1,400 Bitcoin (BTC) via an elaborate hack that affected his Electrum wallet. On-chain analysis indicates that the hackers had a Binance account and that some of the transactions used to move the stolen coins may have originated in St. Petersburg, Russia. However, It is important to note that conclusions afforded by on-chain research are generally more probabilistic than deterministic.
source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-may-know-who-is-behind-the-1-400-btc-electrum-wallet-hack
Copy:Even if there is no transparency about how to attack, the wallet should be secure if the Electrum wallet software settings are correct. The person who claimed the hack says that the attack took place after he implemented his wallet for the first time since 2017. He claims that when he installed the software update, all his inventory was transferred to an unknown address.
Original:Even so, there is no clarity on how the attack was perpetrated, as Electrum's software is considered to be secure if properly configured. The claimant said that the attack happened after he ran the wallet for the first time since 2017. He alleges that when he installed a software update, his entire balance was transferred to an unknown address.
source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-may-know-who-is-behind-the-1-400-btc-electrum-wallet-hack
archive:
https://archive.fo/SECRr#selection-1961.0-1961.10