Hate to break it to you but I never read your posts, nullius. Any time we engage its because I'm responding to your attacks on me and correcting your outright lies. I'm not some bounty hunter who can't form an original thought, and I won't get paid for it as its past the 5th page in that thread (campaign condition). So why would I plagiarize your post?? Do you honestly believe you were the first and only person to notice the highlighted coincidences?
Your blustering
ad hominem counterattack and irrelevant excuses are quoted for reference. Anyone who reviews
the above-quoted evidence can see that you ripped off my post; and its sad that every scammer you have ever tagged is better than you at flimsy evasions when caught red-handed.
We had the same thoughts is a classic. And its a tough sell when your post so closely follows mine in substance, in structure,
and in style:
[General observation that Bitcoiners are attacking NFTs with the same arguments used against Bitcoin.]
- [A checklist of exactly four (4) quasi-quoted examples, punctuated with Unicode checkmarks...]
- [...the examples provided are substantively almost identical, but slightly tweaked and shuffled.]
[Suggestion that this list can be extended.]
A professor of textual analysis could do much better than that in collating the similarities of our posts. I neednt bother.
Your aping of my list
with Unicode checkmarks is especially telling. ✔✓ I have done that in several posts. It is a relatively rare
* style of delivery. By so noting, I do not wish to detract attention from how closely you copied the substance and structure of my post.
You are known to follow the Wall Observer, where I made my post. Thus, you cannot even claim the amazing coincidence of having the same thoughts as some website (or forum thread) that you never even knew about.
Why would you do it? If I had to guess, Id say that you wanted to apply my argumentsbut you did not want to reference my post, because you personally dislike me, and you
pretend that you never read my posts. However, the question of why is mostly irrelevant: It is obvious
what you did.
(* Amusingly enough, I think that it is probably much more rare than use of the English literary stock phrase sow discord; among other places, minor grammatical variations of that phrase are used in the King James Bible, in English translations of Dantes Divine Comedy, and in one of my own Newbie-ranked posts from 2017. So much for reasonably assessing the weight of evidence in various cases.)
Edited to add one additional observation above, and to quote the edited version of nutildahs reply:
Hate to break it to you but I never read your posts, nullius. Any time we engage its because I'm responding to your attacks on me and correcting your outright lies. I'm not some bounty hunter who can't form an original thought, and I won't get paid for it as its past the 5th page in that thread (campaign condition). So why would I plagiarize your post?? Do you honestly believe you were the first and only person to notice the highlighted coincidences?
edit for some evidence from the defendant:
only 2 of the 4 items are similar observations ✔
I used a different type of checkmark ✓
go fuck yourself nullius ✅
(I had a reply tab open before that edit, but didnt post till later because I was busy with something else. I quote nutildahs posts in full, because I have observed that he sometimes edits or deletes his own posts in a dishonestly misleading way.)
