Only for DRPU/S. The holders not wanting to go through KYC have no other choice than to sell off at some point.
You might end up with a situation where those already changed for the new tokens, dont want to buy the original Drp token. Dcorp will be divided between those going through KYC and those who dont.
I then think Dcorp should guarantee DRP holders an exit in some way.
Proposal idea:
The only right way to go about this as I see it, is to have DRP tokens on external exchanges and DRPU/S on VC platform only. That way the demand for the DRP token is held up, since you need that token to get either of the new ones. Investors not wanting to go through KYC can have their exit at market price and supply of DRP token will slowly decrease as more investors go through KYC and change to new tokens.
By doing it this way, you will also have an initially fast changerate, just because DRP tokens are at the cheap end now with full supply and will end up at the expensive end with low supply. Investors wishing to stack up tokens will do it now, because they know the token soon will become more expensive.
If this process were to be democratic in the right spirit of Dcorp, there should before any of us enter the new tokens be a voting. We are all interested in higher demand and less supply of the original DRP token, and we all want to change that token to the new ones in order to take part of later votings and dividend payouts.
Second idea:
-
In order to speed up the process of having investors change from DRP to DRPS/U there could be some sort of discount introduction with time intervals.
Example:
1st half of Dec: 1 DRP changed to 1 DRPS with 30% discount (= 0.3 DRPS) => Total: 1.3 DRPS
2nd half of Dec: 1 DRP changed to 1 DRPS with 15% discount (= 0.15 DRPS) => Total: 1.15 DRPS
1st half of Jan: 1 DRP changed to 1 DRPS with 10% discount (= 0.10 DRPS) => Total: 1.10 DRPS
2nd half of Jan: 1 DRP changed to 1 DRPS with 5% discount (= 0.05 DRPS) => Total: 1.05 DRPS
(If not December and January, some other time intervals!)
Note
The tokenholders of Dcorp are now the owners. Large changes like the KYC introduction without any decent exit offer to all tokenholders, should indeed be voted on in a democratic way.
On your first idea: We would force a fee upon our investors. Right now the initial token change is free.
For your second idea: That wouldnt work. We can't create new tokens, its hardcapped. Thats only possible if the majority called for a vote and voted in favor.
Read the first idea once more. It has got nothing to do with Dcorps fees. If new tokens are kept internal, not listed on any external exchanges, the only way to get hold of new tokens is to buy DRP on external exchanges, go to internal exchange and do the swap. DRP will get burned after the swap. External exchanges will see less and less supply of DRP tokens, since they are get burnt after swap.
There will not be a fee on the swap from DRP. Each DRP will be swapped only once and then get burnt.
With less supply of DRP tokens on external exchanges, the price of DRP will increase to the benefit of all investors in Dcorp. If the price of DRP increases, the prices of DRPS/U increase.
There will be a high demand on DRP, because the only way to stack up more DRPS/U is first to buy DRP on external exchanges and then swap to new tokens on internal exchange.
