<<  >> (p.670)
    Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4383349 times)
    FalconFly
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 252
    Merit: 250

    Sentinel


    View Profile
    December 03, 2013, 04:21:26 PM
    Last edit: December 03, 2013, 04:34:33 PM by FalconFly
     #13381

    21028    2013-12-02 23:33:20    0:28:46    166468331    485    0.00006462    272729    25.29332793    confirmed
    21027    2013-12-02 23:04:34    5:49:17    1993521951    6010    0.00000096    272726    25.00902152    confirmed
    21026    2013-12-02 17:15:17    0:42:40    241981189    966    0.00010627    272690    25.19850076    confirmed

    Annoying indeed...
    I have no issue with the regularly varying score (which always occurs to me despite having a 50MBit pipe with extremely constant connection quality and no significant change neither to total Slush Hash power or my own), but I think that "anti-pool" hopping routine is overly punishing Shares that come to the server just a few seconds late.
    I mean when a round is i.e. 10 hours and I contributed @ full average speed for 9h 59m with the final shares somehow being a tad delayed (despite my GUIminers showing no evidence of any delay/problem whatsoever), that shouldn't be punished so hard.
    Plus, I also see it overnight when there's absolutely no other traffic using my Internet connection, it's 100.0% mining only.

    Just stopping miners (which ran days uninterrupted 24/7) for only 10 seconds (!) to change some settings is making the rewarded BTC taking a considerable and unproportional hit, IMHO that's not okay and making me considering to at least try other pools.
    In the end results, their additional fees become insignificant when compared to the losses I see here everyday due to that extremely aggressive scoring/time vs. reward reduction routine :/
    Additionally because of being new around here, such events always leave a nagging doubt that this behaviour is systemic and intentionally scooping off small fractions of BTC Rewards per participant. No proof for that of course but the doubt remains (especially because now big money is involved every day), those repeating small issues don't quite reduce these doubts :/

    Just my 2 cents from a low profile miner, I'd probably be much more unhappy if I had some big THash rigs rolling and seeing the same...

    This forum signature is like its owner - it can't be bought
Page 669
Viewing Page: 670