You could use a free VPN service...

http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/7-completely-free-vpn-services-protect-privacy/

Mining is not very bandwidth intensive so you should be fine with any of those... or you could SSH tunnel through a VPS, or use a paid VPN...

I'm not entirely sure, but that would be my best bet since it is at work. I know for sure that port 8332 is in stealth mode from an outside port tester "Shields Up!"
I may just be SOL. And I had 35 6750M's to run...


I'm pretty sure vpn is also blocked, but port 443 is open.  I can connect to my home computer on 443, could that be useful?  Client with miner mac10.7 home windows7.

This can be done, fairly easily, but you'll need a basic grasp on networking.  Port 80 is obviously open, so time to get creative in routing things through port 80 Port 443 is open due to SSL.

Create a server off site, or use a remote service that accepts connections on port 80 or 443 and you're set to go (you may need an internal proxy server routing the traffic outward through 443 or 80 if you have 35 seperate computers)

I am pretty sure that it is a max of only 2GH/s.  6750M's run between 40-60 as per  https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison
Well if anyone has any suggestions of how to route out through 80, 3389... other open ports to a home computer and back to slush it would be great.  OR just cut out the home computer.  I would like to do as little installing on the computers as possible and probably run DiabloMiner because it is terminal based. (remember this is a mac).  I have a program that could send commands to the terminal for all computers at once. Using things such as GUIMiner just wouldn't be feasible.

Someone else mentioned Tor, it is still on port 8332, so that wouldn't work.

 

TOTALLY missed the 'M' designation - did my math with 150 MH/s (low-balling the 167 on said site) from the full-blown card.

I RTFM and still F'd it up...   Derp!!!    

Still, two gigahash (with FREE power + hardware) ain't nothing to sneeze at... 

Good Luck bro!

Again... 7 invalid blocks in a row..c'mon!

Calm down, I doubt he can do manual verification in his sleep.

I know, and I'm not mad at him. I just wish that he did NOT have to do manual verification. What is going on with the block explorer sites because no doubt the issue is with them.

oh nice, why does it need to call sha256 function twice though?

Would I have to be logging in verbose mode?

Don't speak too soon!