I made a perfectly reasonable post that is in line with actual data, and it was deleted. No transparency as to who deleted it, no way to appeal it, or determine why it was deleted. How exactly does the moderation work, and why isn't there a better system for oversight/communication when things are deleted? I assume such protocols are in place, but I'm relatively new here.
You can create a thread about it in Meta if you really wish but read the rules first as it was almost certainly removed for breaking one:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/703657.0Posts are removed for a whole host of reasons but staff don't have the time to explain or argue every single one so bear that in mind.
Thanks. Nah, not worth it (and the thread itself would risk getting deleted I guess). Looking at the rules the only one it could possibly be would be #1, which seem quite subjective. I get deleting obvious spam, but beyond that, subjective guidelines enforced in a non-transparent fashion is not a great mechanism. With wikis there's usually some means of seeing the moderation. But clearly I'm new here, so if those are the rules of the game, I'll follow along.