The Cuneta article has so many errors, misunderstandings, misdirections and/or lies, it amazes me that even ignorant people continue posting it.
examples?
"Bitcoin Cash, at the time of this writing, had one Github commit in the last 13 days. Their development team is composed of one to two full-time developers and a handful of unknown others."
Bitcoin Cash is the blockchain, not a SW project. There are several independent teams working on clients for this blockchain. One of these teams alone has more than two full-time developers. Others have some number of known developers. I don't know which of these projects github he checked, nor which day he checked it. But at least one Bitcoin Cash client uses a code repository other than github. So even if his monitored github account (which one?) had only one commit in 13 days, it is pretty much irrelevant. Maybe it wasn't a github repository relevant to Bitcoin Cash. Maybe he's just making it up anyway. Who knows?
How many lies and omission are we up to so far? And this is in only one quarter-paragraph. The entire thing is rife with inanities.