Well, Stake has sent either the pre-monthly bonus or the post-monthly bonus on each month of this year. I thought that Stake hadn't given the pre and post monthly bonus much this year. But I was surprised when I checked my mailbox. They haven't sent both of those bonuses in the same month though. But I remember that Stake had given both pre and post monthly bonuses on two to three months in the previous year. FYI, here is the date of pre or post monthly bonus of this year.

• 3 January - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 5 February - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 24 March - Post-monthly Bonus
• 24 April - Post-monthly Bonus
• 1 May - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 29 June - Post-monthly Bonus
• 24 July - Post-monthly Bonus
• 21 August - Post-monthly Bonus
• 30 September - Post-monthly Bonus

It could be we all are biased and psychologically prepared to pay more attention to losses when we use real money rather then we use play money and pay more attention to having a good time and having more fun with nothing actually at risk of being taken away from us.

There is also a possibility of some small letter sections of the contract/ term of service of gams providers, stating the actual chances of winning money are applied when gamblers use real money, in the case they use fake/play money providers would enhance the chances of winning on their games, with the excuse of showing off animations and interactions on the demo mode.

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense



its annoying as all hell losing and every single time in my head im saying scam and wishing death upon everyone, though that lasts 5-10 minutes, after which i just be annoyed at myself for poor bankroll management or getting too strung up on a game that i just didnt stop when i shoulda. i understand how the provably fair system operates and have pulled json files filled with my bets and analysed them on several occasions and the proof is right there in front of you if you do this because it is undeniably not doing anything weird with the sequence or amounts being calculated for each bet. ive had both sides happen, extreme luck and extreme lack of luck. Guaranteed i do not remember half as many of the lucky times as i do the unlucky times. That isnt a sign of something being nefariously manipulated or anything, that is pretty much a textbook example of gamblers fallacy.

Anyhow, if you are playing a game you think is rigged and continue to play it anyway, or continue to play at that casino day after day regardless, you deserve the misfortune cus thats just lacking in intelligence and awareness, the worst combo to be lacking in.

what are you waffling about exactly? cus it doesnt apply to the obvious thing i am getting at. currently the next several tournaments are as follows

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$1 buy-in → $75 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$5 buy-in → $200 prize

$5 buy-in → $100 prize

$2 buy-in → $200 prize

make it make sense

---

there is literally one poker platform that achieves over 100k frequently and that is ggpoker, just fyi. competition isnt less it is more. gamblers gambling is not easier than vs someone that knows how to play good poker. I know, ive won the freerolls twice so far. Much more luck required. where on earth did u come up with these outcomes of stake's experience vs something like pokerstars? baffling to say the least. do you play poker? any anyway, to round off dismissing your claims, stake makes way more than every poker platform, minus ggpoker, combined.

there is literally one poker platform that achieves over 100k frequently and that is ggpoker, just fyi. competition isnt less it is more. gamblers gambling is not easier than vs someone that knows how to play good poker. I know, ive won the freerolls twice so far. Much more luck required. where on earth did u come up with these outcomes of stake's experience vs something like pokerstars? baffling to say the least. do you play poker?  anyway, to round off dismissing your claims, stake makes way more than every poker platform, minus ggpoker, combined.

i feel like the question of my preferred ratio of prizes to buy-ins is too simple to waste my time explaining. here is an brief example.

assuming the same game and type - if $2 buy in has prize of $100, $4 should have $200. Linear. Not erratic. Starting to think you've played a part in coming up with this mess lmao.

I haven't had that experience and it would be great I have it to know what I would think of myself not using money when by the result of my gambling it felt like the right time to have stake actual cash.

This things do occur and sometimes I think it's just the casino messing with our head so we can use the money we initially didn't want to use to gamble. Because tell me why on earth will I use zero dollars to bet and  make high numbers in a row and just when I decided to use money it's turn to be a loss.

It was easy to find out those messages from the mailbox, I have used the keywords pre-monthly and post-monthly to find out them. It only took a few minutes to write down those dates.

BTW, today I have found that Stake has sent me an exclusive Champions League bonus yesterday. I have received $15 from the bonus and turned it to $220 and made a withdrawal successfully. Looks like Stake is trying to make me active again by giving the exclusive bonuses and blessing my account with some luck .

If those are getting hacked.

Mostly transactions is getting out by the hacker, and what reason hacker deposit to your account. Cause hacker is always making outside transaction not deposit, plus quite weird to verify your accoount based transaction history.

Could be those one of the factor, but usually they can just match based on ID or data account has been verified with Level 2.

If the account is a high level account, the hacker might decide to deposit and wager in other to get rewards. The stake employee is supposed to know the difference between a compromised account and an account where the user wants to change his email. For a compromised account, asking for screenshots is unnecessary.  A selfie or video with his id would have been more appropriate