more and more ico projects that increase the duration of sales when ico is running
may be the factor of the yesterday's issue which has reduced investors
hopefully this will be the right decision for the project to succeed

It is true that making the best decision is not easy. The important thing is to be patient with a big project for achieving active marketing.

What if all the coins are sold in 1 day, will 7 rounds be held or will ICO end immediately?

I believe that this project is going to be more popular in the future. It has good benefits for both buyers and sellers. Especially for the sellers. I love the idea that escrow exchanges the cryptomoney to fiat in advance. So there is no lost in a possible dump for the sellers.

A Secure, Transparent and Robust platform.The future of online platform.

for real? what a big amount for a certain activity before the ico kicks off.. well im sure, with that certain amount, means many trusted the project, by the time ico opens, it will definitely flood investors.

So many people asking so here you go. My personal review of Monetha vs UTRUST:

The Monetha Team:
- Small and not even a single software engineer
The UTRUST Team:
- Large and with a highly technical background

Monetha Whitepaper:
- Confusing and hard to understand if this is something really needed
UTRUST Whitepaper:
- Very clear to understand the model just by glancing at the paper summary

Monetha fees for seller:
- 1.5%
UTRUST fees for seller:
- 1%

Monetha Concept:
- Simplistic view and solves no intrinsic problem.
UTRUST Concept:
- Solves a major problem in crypto payments - Buyer protection for cryptocurrency. This is something that is needed for the mass adoption and doesn’t exist. Can be easily used by merchants and private sellers alike.

Monetha accepts:
- Just ETH.
UTRUST accepts:
- All major cryptocurrencies.

Monetha adoption by merchants:
- Limited to merchants that wish to accept ETH and no other cryptocurrencies. Amazon, Ebay, Ali, and many more already have feedback scores, therefore Monethas model will not gain tracking and be adopted by any major merchants. Since it solves no problem, very low appeal to buyers.
UTRUST adoption by merchants:
- Buyers can pay with multiple cryptocurrencies and have a safety net when making their payments, with sellers having a higher selling rate. Will gain organic traction, bringing more clients by referral as they feel more satisfied and protected.

-Monetha adoption by buyers:
- Buyers can only pay with ETH. Feedback score system already exists and solves no problem in practice. Feedback rate is unreliable and subject to false reports and paid bias, as many others.
UTRUST adoption by buyers:
- Buyers can pay with multiple cryptocurrencies. Buyers feel safer making payments with cryptocurrencies knowing that if something goes wrong they can appeal, escalate and be refunded.

If you pay with Monetha and an vendor scams you, the only thing you will be able to do is put a negative review and your money is gone. With UTRUST you will get your money back.

In the newest whitepaper there is information about the break between ICO rounds.

"in the worst-case scenario, the total duration will be of 55 days (with each one of the 7 rounds closing in 7 days, plus the 24 hours in between)"

I understand that this is an outdated information and ICO will take place without this break.

I think Utrust should reduce the number of rounds as this will cause many investors to wait very long and this can affect a lot of the price when getting on the official exchange. I hope dev will have more updates in the future to help people get a good look in the project.

These people do not even have the initial prototype of their product. They arranged a fundraiser for unrealizable idea.