It all depends of adoption by users, this kind of projects need a huge user base to function normally. Soma team will have to invest a lot in marketing campaign to get that user traction.

I hope not for them, there was already an hack back in july ($30M disappeared), it would be dumb to create a parity's multisig wallet right now. I asked this also on Utrust thread btw.
If you want to learn some more on the parity's multisig wallets issue: https://btc.icymi.email/someone-accidentally-locked-up-300-million-worth-of-other-peoples-ethereum/

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ywbqmg/parity-multi-signature-wallet-vulnerability-300-million-hard-fork

I hope not. Without an Ethereum fork the funds in the wallets are locked forever. Or maybe a more accurate analogy would be the lock is gone and the money is stuck in a safe without a door.

I also think that soma can touch non crypto user, cause the platform seems to be very users friendly and the concept of soma is really easy to understand but disruptive.

I think I saw a list of affected addresses. We can check if Soma's address is in there. The address was posted a while ago.

This is quite possible. Their user interface is great and very intuitive and this can attract potential customers 

Thats what it should be, if its about community, they need to reach everyone outside of crypto too.
Actually only a few people in this world know crypto.

Would be better if he contacted the team instead of pressing that big, red button, but I do not think the Parity developers are free from blame. It is not even the first time this happened to them!

Such problems are definitly not bringing trust into crypto world. People who will have currently nothing to do probably think, if they read about this, that it's too dangerous to have their money in crypto.

There's still a lot of work to do with the security of the system.