The intended purpose of the offsite system is primarily for investors to decrease their counterparty risk by holding part of their investment themselves. It was never intended as a roundabout way for investors to increase their risk beyond what is safe according to the Kelly criterion.

But as bustadice's bankroll continues to grow, I believe the offsite system is increasingly being (ab)used to do just that. At over 5,800 BTC, bustadice's bankroll is only rarely fully utilized, so investors' desire to gain a larger stake in it by leveraging is understandable. However, it is arguably unfair towards other investors and is also not in bustadice's best interest, which ideally wants a stable and highly utilized bankroll.

In the past I've already reduced the maximum leverage for new offsite investments a number of times to discourage overleveraging and today I am disabling the ability to make new offsite investments entirely. Existing offsite investments are unaffected. Investors with offsite investments can still add to or remove from their onsite bankroll without being forced to divest their offsite portion. It is also possible to lower your offsite investment without fully removing it.

The team behind the project have to fix the issue as early as they can. Because users are eagerly waiting to make the use of the platform.

for their signature campaign here the link, but it seems the campaign currently is full. so you need until they have an open spot for new member
as i know that there is no KYC required for withdrawing in bustabit/bustadice

Bustadice is my trusted gambling sites and one of the popular gambling sites that has been existing for long.  I have been gambling with them.  I like the withdrawal system and process and I wish other gambling sites really emulate them.

The withdrawal process is so fast, you don't have to wait for an amount of confirmation.

And the cheapest fee that I've ever paid to withdraw was around 1.68 bits which is pretty low.

Regarding with Bustabit/Bustadice then theres no doubt that this is one of the best gambling sites nowadays and yes it would really be needed up some research before tending to play on any gambling sites.If we dont like to experience hassle and problems then better stick out to the most popular ones rather than trying out new and unknown sites.I have experience on playing bustabit and its still one of the most popular game nowadays.

Thank you for the reply. I have never heard of those two users before.

Ethercrash looks a complete clone of Bustabit. Did they create their site with the intention of making it look like Bustabit?

And did they pay the licence fee to use the crash software?

Yes, they payed for the license fee and also they are famous among the people who play Bustabit V1, ever since Bustabit removed bonus, people played on ethcrash.io ( now the new site is ethercrash.io with new management ).

People wanted the old experience of bustabit back so yeah, it looks like old Bustabit, but they did make some UI designs to distinguish from the rest of the clone sites that run the bustabit v1 code.

Thank you for the link. I forgot about that URL. Yes it seems ethercrash did buy a licence.

What is confusing though is how the Bustabit and Ethercrash websites seem almost identical down to the layout and even chat plugin. I thought licences were regarding the crash software only so how did ethercrash end up getting a clone of Bustabit?