<<  >> (p.67)
    Author Topic: NY Talks  (Read 26112 times)
    myrthme
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 96
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    October 28, 2018, 09:41:52 AM
    Last edit: October 28, 2018, 09:57:13 AM by myrthme
     #1321

    I wonder, why nobody discusses the court case against Rusbase?

    Looks like it was really customized because in the article the dirt flows against Worldcore. The court says the trademark legally neither belongs to citizen Nasonov, nor the “EUPSProvider s.r.o.” because of the long registration procedure.  Grin
    In addition, the court considered that the information contained in the article is nothing more than an expression of the right of everyone to express their opinion.  Grin

    The facts contained in the article are an expression of a subjective opinion, and are not a priori subject to verification of reality.

    And what is most funny, the court points out that "the phrases challenged by the Claimants consist almost entirely of neologisms, Anglicisms and jargon, and belong to the category of "passive" vocabulary ... and do not have an unequivocal interpretation." Grin

    So, the Russian court of the first echelon says that the word "scam", in particular, is familiar to it, but is not in any dictionary and is not included in "active" vocabulary, and therefore its use is considered solely an expression of subjective opinion and does not affect the reputation.  Grin Grin Grin
Page 66
Viewing Page: 67