A prevalent issue with many token projects is scalability, particularly as it relates to microtransactions. High gas fees make these small transactions uneconomical. This is not an issue for sales-based rewards on the Signal Marketplace, but it is an issue for view-based rewards. Our current workaround for this is transaction batching, where reward transactions are only executed when they’ve reached a minimum required “batch” count, such that the gas fees do not exceed the rewards themselves. For general intents and purposes, this works just fine. However, because it requires us to manage the batch data, it is not fully decentralized. To address this, we will be exploring some blockchain alternatives (i.e. EOS) while also keeping a close eye on scalability developments in the Ethereum world (Sharding, etc.).

Don't limit yourselves to blockchain-based consensus, there are the DAG solutions and hashgraph. Maybe one of your team members should experiment building upon these platforms.

Coming to live conference is always good but giving good update will also help the community to understand how potential the future of spectiv is going to be will help to wait until development phase and there should help to reach the goals.

And more time for people to dump. pain. I often wonder when will altcoins have some sort of relief rally. Eight months of continuous dumping needs some sort of equilibrium.

The spread is terrible there and I don't think trading on that exchange would help in any way for SIGs get listed on better exchanges.