So your point can be summarized like to each his own, everyone for himself and devil take the hindmost. To put it differently, you can't expect anyone to behave responsible, as in money printing, when they can easily get away with being completely irresponsible as is the case with virtually any government. But then it is not an economic question anymore. In other words, it makes no sense to deal with such issues from purely economic point of view. Otherwise we will always be missing the whole picture.

Both are having a good value in the market but they are totally different in terms of used and the way it grows. We've knew gold for so long and it's great image in the public until bitcoin's comes arrived and people Turing their heads for these.  Not exactly people forget gold but because if having a huge value of bitcoin recently they might get lost their attention into it. 

The last time I did this analysis, gold was a thousand times more expensive than Bitcoin, if we compare the same proportions of total supply.  By now, Bitcoin has risen 30-fold, and so gold is only 30 times more expensive.

Of course, I was roundly dismissed for speculating Bitcoin could get anywhere near a six-figure price in dollars.  If I was criticized for being too bullish on Bitcoin, today I might be seen as too bullish on gold.

How to answer the question -- where to from here?  As I wrote recently, gold is objectively a better money for securing savers' freedom from governments and central banks.  So, if the long-term price ratio is 10 to 1 in favor of gold, Bitcoin can still go up 3 times.  It'd still be a great return by the standards of any asset, but Bitcoin is not quite as compelling as it used to be.

Especially, many early owners of Bitcoin, now flush with capital, who are also sympathetic to gold, might decide to sell some Bitcoin and buy gold at these prices.

We have to be careful here.  This entire analysis was based on the (pretty common) assumption that governments and central banks have nothing to do with gold and Bitcoin prices, and that the future of Bitcoin is to be another limited-supply monetary asset like gold, but at an appropriate relative price.  (The reality, at least with gold prices, is of course the opposite.)

So, the real question is what the Western elites want (and what China and Russia want, if they're able to counter the West in the field of monetary engineering.)  If Western debt levels and resulting economic/social/political problems are so bad that the elites have decided to use cryptocurrency to effect a reset of the entire system, to effectively wipe out their debt and start afresh, as just after World War II, then the sky is the limit for Bitcoin and cryptos.

If, on the other hand, the Western elites are only preparing for such a reset by taking advantage of cheap crypto prices so far, then we have to watch the relative price to gold.  The rise of Bitcoin, so far, is consistent with this scenario too.  From here on, our thinking might have to change.

For the answer to that question, watch the news closely for the signs!

Charlie Wozniak (apple co founder) said something interesting within an interview recently. This individual said humanity will create better and more effective methods to harvest yellow metal from the earth's brown crust area. Bitcoin's algorithmic approach to constraining its own production has superior chances of retaining a regular rate of source.

The actual test of platinum is actually society can realistically revert to a gold standard in instances of emergency. If a zombie apocalypse occurred down the road, would gold emerge as a preferred coin of exchange across remnants of civilization? There are videos on youtube where people walk the streets trying to sell $1, 1000 of gold or metallic for $50. No one takes them up on it. The idea of gold and its value as a currency may be too neglected within the population eye to be an emergent currency in times of distress. Not really only is support for gold exchange non-existent, their utility as a means of exchange may be a lost lore similar to the recipe for making roman concrete or damascus steel.

Golds best hope may be a form of gold renaissance, a resurgence of interest driven by fears relating to fiat hyperinflation. This kind of is occurring in certain groups. Preppers, doomsdayers and post apocalyptic planners are inventory up on important mining harvests. What gold lacks in bling power and exhilaration it could more than replace in endurance.

Via my posts on this forum, it could be evident I actually favor bitcoin over platinum. But even I no longer forget gold was here millennia before anyone realized what bitcoin was, and may be around millennia after bitcoin is lost and forgotten.

Both of that is good on pricing but theres a big defferences of prices because bitcoin is moving a price and the price is moving theres big down of price or high of price and its nice to buy if the pricing of bitcoin will low because you will get a good profit if the bitcoin will rise again while the gold its very slowly to growth the price and its very expensive to buy but if you buy a gold we can sure the good profit.

Gold has been in its niche for more than three thousand years. If bitcoin at least 100 years will grow by 1000% per year, it will be the best tool for investment. Bitcoins in the world are 23 million, capitalization is 200 billion dollars. Gold in the world for 7000 years. was extracted 161 million kilograms, and the total capitalization exceeds 9 trillion dollars. Bitkoinu need to increase in price at least 45 times to achieve gold capitalization

But you just said that it wasn't what you meant. But never mind, I'm not nitpicking or whatever, I just want to say that it seems to be a dead-end from which there is no way out, no escape. The financial elites will never agree to accept crypto because they invented fiat not to go back to what can be called "digital gold" (in respect to controlled monetary supply). If this is the case, then we can't deal with these problems (e.g. inflation) and try to explain them on a purely economic basis. We will always have to consider the arbitrariness of the financial establishment actions.