It is not overdue.  It will not happen.  Until a forked client gets released.

You thought that post was insulting?  It said what you just said, that you are learning, and have no idea about a lot of this stuff.    I don't have any questions at the moment to ask.  I think I understood things well enough.

Again, can you link to some specifics where someone did days of work for 200K dvc?

Maybe that is why you should have .... TESTED IT.  Try to guess how long it was from the time Satoshi published his paper to the public release of the v0.1 client.  It was roughly a year.

What you paid to have happen is irrelivent.  The code doesn't care.  The code is what the code is.  Right now every client expects all blocks (every single one) from 251 onward to be 49.  Any change to that is a hard fork.  It doesn't matter that you "want" the change it is still a hard fork. 

Nodes running the "old" code and "new" code will split at the first superblock.  The old nodes will see a block with any value other than 49 as invalid and reject the block.  The new nodes won't.  That is the very definition of a hard fork.  A difference is action between nodes running on the network.

When you pay a programmer to do a job you assume testing it is part of the job.

And in fact he said he was running it and it was all looking good.   To me that means he was testing it.  I asked around and everyone had nothing but good things to say about this guy.  In fact most said, if anyone can do this for you, it's this guy. 

He was the best I found, and he was not the cheapest as I even offered him extra money (almost double) to ensure it was done right, but he refused to take it so he is an honest guy.
 
The guy obviously made a mistake since this is something new compared to the way the super blocks for the other crapCoin were done.

And I'm no programmer I have no idea how to test something like this.


It's time for me to step away from this thread again cause I'm ready to shit a cow.

If anyone can PM me with the parameters to solo mine this coins I would appreciate it.

Why don't you focus on reading and learning yourself instead of writing such a huge amount of useless stuff?

Yes, though most of the posts and almost all of the bounties are still in the one original super long thread, of which I have post #4.    I have been watching devcoin and it's bounties for longer then you have.  I also am aware of the scope of work of most of the programming projects they have had bounties for.    I have never seen anything like you are claiming to have seen.


I can doubt you as I too have read the devcoin threads and seen the bounties.   You either are misunderstanding the scope/effort the bounty took, or the real reason it got done.   In order for me to understand which I need to know what bounty you consider to have been done like you claim.



I am doing more then believing what I want...   I read the devcoin threads and bounties and have never seen one that took two days of work for 200k coins.  I have never seen one even  anywhere near as lowball as your $20 to set up a pool and then own 50% of the take.  Since you say you know of these, you should be able to find them easily without needing to dig using the search and we can see if I missed them, or you misunderstand the scope.


Right, a lot of the stuff done for low prices, would really have gotten done anyway.   The bounty just gave the final motivation, or a fun little bonus.  I know I usually lose money every time I take time out to work on coin code.

Oh my god now he's trying to solo mine on a laptop and needs someone to tell him how to set up solo mining his own coin.  Holy shit you can't make this stuff up.  This is a new low lol

Amazingly spot on TL;DR